The great iron-working age of India seems to have been in the fourth
and fifth centuries of our era, when the blacksmiths must have been
skilful and commanded an unlimited supply of the best metal. The Lát or
iron-pillar of Delhi, to mention no other, is a solid shaft, showing
that the people were unable to make a core. This simple piece of
wrought metal, calculated to weigh seventeen tons and to contain eighty
cubic feet of metal, measures in diameter 16·4 inches tapering to
12·05. The height above ground is twenty-two feet, and excavations of
twenty-six feet did not reach the base: the known length therefore is
upwards of forty-eight feet.[374] The sundry inscriptions punched upon
it are of very various dates: Prinsep[375] assigns our third or fourth
century to the Nagari character in which Rajah Dhava thus ‘renowned
it’:—
‘By him who, learning the warlike preparations and entrenchments of
his enemies with their good soldiers and allies, a monument of fame
engraved by his Sword on their limbs, who as master of the seven
advantages,[376] crossing over (the Indus?), so subdued the Vahlikas of
Sindhu [N.B.: they can hardly be the ‘people of Balkh’] that even at
this day his disciplined force and defences on the south (of the river)
are sacredly respected by them,’ &c. &c.
Metallurgists dispute as to the way in which this huge iron rod was
wrought. One writer,[377] however, seems to have hit upon the solution
of the problem: ‘The column may have been forged standing, by welding
on, one over another, thin iron plates or dires, the fire being built
round the column as it grew; and the ground raised in a mound to keep
the top of the column on a level with the workplace.’ Pyramid-building
has been explained in the same way—a causeway.
But the Lát is not the only marvel of Hindu metallurgy. Mr. James
Fergusson found in the Temple of Kanaruc, or Black Pagoda of the Madras
Presidency, beams of wrought iron about twenty-one feet in length and
eight inches section, to strengthen the roof, which the Hindus, in
their distrust of the arch, formed after their usual bracket-fashion.
In the fane of Mahavellipore he discovered sockets for similar
supports. He assigns to the Black Pagoda a date between A.D. 1236 and
1241; and to Mahavellipore any time between our tenth and fourteenth
centuries.[378] Colonel Pearse, R.A. presented to the trustees of the
British Museum a unique collection of archaic tools, iron and steel,
gouges, spatulæ, ladles, and similar articles, dug out of tumuli at
Wari Gaon, near Kampti. But there are no grounds whatever for dating
them ‘about B.C. 1500, or the time of Moses.’
[Heading: _WOOTZ._]
The _ferrum Indicum_[379] of the Classics may still be represented by
the famous Wootz or Wutz,[380] the ‘natural Indian steel,’ still so
much prized for Sword-blades in Persia and Afghanistan. The specimens
first sent in 1795 to the Royal Society of London were analysed by Mr.
Josiah M. Heath with the results given below.[381]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account