M. Sévoz, an engineer of mines long resident in Japan, studied
iron-working in the province of Ykouno.[402] He found the people
using an imperfect Catalan method, but able to treat at once sixteen
thousand kilogrammes of ore, and to produce blooms weighing one
thousand three hundred kilogrammes. These huge rods were broken up
under a hammer constructed in the style of a pile-driving ram, to which
motion was given by a walking-wheel 11·5 mètres in diameter, mounted by
men. The description does not promise much; but Japan, though holding
to her ancient methods in districts unknown to Europeans, produces iron
cheaper than the English. Of her marvellous Swords I shall treat in
Part II.
The people of Madagascar worked iron,[403] but their name of the
metal is Malayan; hence Mr. Crawford traced the art back to Malacca.
Yet the Malay did not extend it far eastwards: according to Mr. E.
B. Tylor,[404] ‘In New Zealand, where there is good iron-ore, there
was no knowledge of iron previously to the arrival of Europeans.’
Passing over to the American continent, we find an immense industry
of copper, but so little iron that, till late years, the indigenes
were supposed not to have worked it. Ynka mines, however, have been
discovered near Lake Titicaca; while excavations in the tumuli of
the mysterious ‘Mound-builders,’ who may have attempted to reproduce
the Egyptian Pyramid, yielded axes described to be of ‘hæmatite
iron-ore,’ one of the easiest metals to smelt, and for that reason
probably one of the first worked. Mr. Day, who figures one of these
tool-weapons with the hammer-marks (p. 218), supposes it to have been
‘metallic iron,’ pronouncing hæmatite ‘extremely brittle and absolutely
unforgeable.’[405] He quotes Mr. Charles C. Abbott,[406] who procured
other specimens of aboriginal manufacture from the mounds. One hatchet
was four and a half inches long by two broad, and nearly uniform in
thickness, three-sixteenths of an inch; it had a well-defined edge,
which from its slightly wavy outline and varied breadth, appeared to be
hammered, not ground. According to Major Hotchkiss, who owned two other
similar specimens, a series of four was found under an uprooted tree on
an Indian trail in West Virginia.
Fragments of unworked hæmatite, small and irregular, were used instead
of flint for arrow-heads.[407] Mr. Abbott also notices ‘a curious form
of “relic,” known as a “plummet,” occasionally occurring and made of
iron ore: one specimen[408] “is made of iron ore ground down until it
is almost as smooth as glass.” As such “plummets” are found in the
Western Mounds, as well as on the surface of the ground throughout
the Atlantic coast States, and are always polished, it seems fair
to presume that a cutting instrument of such hard material would
undoubtedly be polished and ground, if at the time of its manufacture
grinding was known or practised among the aborigines in fashioning
their various weapons and instruments.’
[Heading: _IRON IN AFRICA._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account