But if the savages and barbarians of Oceania and the New World rarely
worked iron, the contrary was the case with the equally uncivilised
African races, negroid and negro, who, however, had the advantage of
dwelling within importing and imitating distance of Egypt. I have
elsewhere noticed the excellent assegai-blades of the Bantu (Kafirs);
nor is this art confined to the southern regions.[409] Dr. Percy
justly makes wrought iron the original form, which we see retained
in the obscurer parts of Asia and Africa. The people always worked
by the ‘direct process,’ the oldest style; which, however, is not
wholly extinct in Europe. The art, quasi-stationary among wild men,
treats small quantities at a time: the ‘voracious iron-works’ of which
Evelyn first speaks, are beyond its wants. Moreover it can utilise
only rich ores, unlike the ‘indirect process’ of producing cast-iron
by the blast-furnace.[410] When the ore is nearly pure, a small
addition of carbon would convert it into steel;[411] and the latter
is so easily made, that the wild Hill-peoples of Africa and India
produce, and have produced from time immemorial, an excellent article
in the most primitive way. The proportion of charcoal is considerably
increased, and the blast is applied more slowly than when wrought iron
is required. The only apparatus wanted for the manufacture is a small
clay furnace, four feet high by one to two broad, like that used by the
South Africans; charcoal for fuel, and a skin with a pipe or twyers
of refractory clay for the blast.[412] For the anvil a stone-slab
suffices, and for the hammer a cube of stone with sides grooved for
fibre-cords.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account