The lower animals are born armed, but not weaponed. The arm, indeed, is
rather bestial than human: the weapon is, speaking generally, human,
not bestial. Naturalists have doubted, and still doubt, whether in
the so-called natural state the lower animals use weapons properly
so termed. Colonel A. Lane Fox, a diligent student of primitive
warfare, and a distinguished anthropologist,[6] distinctly holds
the hand-stone to be _the_ prehistoric weapon. He quotes (Cat. pp.
156–59) the ape using the hand-stone to crack nutshells; the gorillas
defending themselves against the Carthaginians of Hanno; and Pedro
de Cieza (Cieça) de Leon[7] telling us that ‘when the Spaniards [in
Peru] pass under the trees where the monkeys are, these creatures
break off branches and throw them down, making faces all the time.’
Even in the days of Strabo (xv. 1) it was asserted that Indian monkeys
climb precipices, and roll down stones upon their pursuers—a favourite
tactic with savages. Nor, indeed, is it hard to believe that the
Simiads, whose quasi-human hand has prehensile powers, bombard their
assailants with cocoa-nuts and other missiles. Major Denham (1821–24),
a trustworthy traveller, when exploring about Lake Chad, says of the
quadrumans of the Yeou country: ‘The monkeys, or, as the Arabs say, men
enchanted (_Beny Adam meshood_),[8] were so numerous that I saw upwards
of a hundred and fifty assembled at one place in the evening. They did
not appear at all inclined to give up their ground, but, perched on the
top of a bank some twenty feet high, made a terrible noise, and, rather
gently than otherwise, pelted us as we approached within a certain
distance.’ Herr Holub,[9] also, was ‘designedly aimed at by a herd of
African baboons perched among the trees;’ and on another occasion he
and his men had to beat an ignominious retreat from ‘our cousins.’
‘Hence,’ suggests Colonel A. Lane Fox, ‘our “poor relation” conserves,
even when bred abroad and in captivity, the habit of violently shaking
the branch by jumping upon it with all its weight, in order that the
detached fruit may fall upon the assailant’s head.’ In Egypt, as we see
from the tomb-pictures, monkeys (baboons or cynocephali) were taught to
assist in gathering fruit, and in acting as torch-bearers. While doing
this last duty, their innate petulance caused many a merry scene.[10]
I never witnessed this bombardment by monkeys. But when my regiment
was stationed at Baroda in Gujarát, several of my brother officers
and myself saw an elephant use a weapon. The intelligent animal,
which the natives call Háthi (‘the handed’[11]), was chained to a
post during the dangerous season of the wet forehead, and was swaying
itself in ill-temper from side to side. Probably offended by the sudden
appearance of white faces, it seized with its trunk a heavy billet,
and threw it at our heads with a force and a good will that proved the
worst intention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account