II. The stroke or blow which led to the cut would be seen exemplified
in the felidæ, by the terrible buffet of the lion, by the clawing
of the tiger and the bear, and by the swing of the trunk of the
‘half-reasoner with the hand.’ Man also would observe that the zebra
and the quagga (so called from its cry, _wag-ga, wag-ga_[23]), the
horse and the ass, the camel, the giraffe, and even the cow, defend
themselves with the kick or hoof-blow; while the ostrich, the swan,
and the larger birds of prey assault with a flirt or stroke of the
wing. The aries or sea-ram (_Delphinus orca_) charges with a butt.
The common whale raises the head with such force that it has been
held capable of sinking a whaler: moreover, this mammal uses the huge
caudal fin or tail in battle with man and beast; for instance, when
engaged with the fox-shark or thresher (_Carcharias vulpes_).[24]
These, combined with the force of man’s doubled fist, would suggest
the ‘noble art’ of boxing: it dates from remote antiquity; witness
the cestus or knuckle-duster of the classics, Greeks, Romans, and
Lusitanians. So far from being confined to Great or Greater Britain,
as some suppose, it is still a favourite not only with the Russian
peasants, but also with the Hausas, Moslem negroids who did such good
service in the Ashanti war. A curious survival of the feline armature
is the Hindu’s Wágh-nakh. Following Demmin, Colonel A. Lane Fox[25] was
in error when he described this ‘tiger’s-claw’ as ‘an Indian weapon of
treachery belonging to a secret society, and invented about A.D. 1659.’
Demmin[26] as erroneously attributes the Wágh-nakh to Sívají, the
Prince of Maráthá-land in Western India, who traitorously used it upon
Afzal Khan, the Moslem General of Aurangzeb, sent (A.D. 1659) to put
down his rebellion.[27] A meeting of the chiefs was agreed upon, and
the Moslem, quitting his army, advanced with a single servant; he wore
a thin robe, and carried only a straight sword. Sívají, descending from
the fort, assumed a timid and hesitating air, and to all appearance
was unarmed. But he wore mail under his flimsy white cotton coat, and
besides a concealed dagger, he carried his ‘tiger’s-claw.’ The Khan
looked with contempt at the crouching and diminutive ‘mountain rat,’
whom the Moslems threatened to bring back in cages; but, at the moment
of embracing, the Maráthá struck his Wágh-nakh into his adversary’s
bowels and despatched him with his dagger. The Wágh-nakh in question is
still kept as a relic, I am told, by the Bhonslá family.[28] Outside
the hand you see nothing but two solid gold rings encircling the
index and the minimus; these two are joined inside by a steel bar,
which serves as a connecting base to three or four sharp claws, thin
enough to fit between and to be hidden by the fingers of a half-closed
hand. The attack is by ripping open the belly: and I have heard of
a poisoned Wágh-nakh which may have been suggested by certain poison
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account