The Book of Trinity College Dublin 1591-1891Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland)
History
The Book of Trinity College Dublin 1591-1891
Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland)
Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland)
_July 23, 1629._--Sir Walworth said to have sold his study to
haunt the town. Somers, Deane, and Elliott appointed to sit bare
for going out of the Hall before grace, and not performing it,
made to stand by the pulpit.
_April 2._--The proclamation against Priests and Jesuits came
forth.
_April 5._--Easter day, at which the forms were used for
conveniency about the Communion Table.
_April 11._--Mr. Travers, for omitting his Common place the
second time appointed, punished 13s. Mr. Tho. for omitting
prayers reading, 5s.
_May 12._--The Sophisters proposed supper to the Bachelors:
prevented by sending for them and forbidding them to attempt it.
_July 11._--The Fellow Commoners complain of Mr. Price for
forbidding them to play at bowls in the Orchard; they were
blamed, and it was shown that by Statute they could not play
there.
_July 29._--Six natives, Dominus Kerdiffe, Ds. Conway, Ds. Baker,
Ds. Davis, Ds. Kerdiffe, jun., and Burton, admonished for being
often absent from Irish Prayers.
_August 19._--The natives to lose their weekly allowance if they
are absent from prayers on the Lord’s Day.
_August 29._--Sir Springham said to keep a hawk. Rawley, for
drunkenness and knocking Strank’s head against the seat of the
Chapel, to have no further maintenance from the house.
Booth, for taking a pig of Sir Samuel Smith’s, and that openly
in the day time before many, and causing it to be dressed in
town, inviting Mr. Rollon and Sir Conway (who knew not of it) was
condemned to be whipped openly in the Hall, and to pay for the
pig.
_August 6._--Communion. Sermon upon Psalm 71. 16. The Articles of
the Church of Ireland read.[31]
The entries of the 29th August (1629) are peculiarly interesting,
but have hitherto not been understood in their local connection.
There is an entry in Mr. Gilbert’s _Assembly Roll_ (ii., p. 82)
awarding a citizen £8 for a goshawk he had purchased for the city,
which hawk had died. This is a very large sum--perhaps equal to
£70 now, and out of all proportion to the salaries and the prices
of necessaries in the College. To keep a hawk was, therefore,
somewhat like keeping an expensive hunter now, and a proof of great
extravagance. As regards the story of the pig, it was nothing more
than a comic carrying out of an order (above, p. 13) frequently
issued by the Corporation, whom Booth took at their word. It seems,
therefore, that either such proclamations were a sham, or that
they only referred to the right of citizens to interfere with the
roving swine.
[Illustration: THE SOUTH BACK OF THE ELIZABETHAN COLLEGE.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account