The Book of Trinity College Dublin 1591-1891Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland)
History
The Book of Trinity College Dublin 1591-1891
Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland)
Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland)
The Fellows were the subjects of common obloquy; every little
indiscretion of their former lives was ripped up; everything
they said or did had a wrong turn given to it. Numberless false
stories about them were spread throughout the kingdom. Some of
them were publicly affronted in the Courts of Law by one of his
Majesty’s servants for appearing to do the common offices of
every honest man. One noble Lord declared that a Fellow’s blood
did not deserve an inquisition which might detain a man one day
from his ordinary business. However, the Judges (except one)
all spoke loudly in favour of the College, and specially the
Chief Baron.
Primate Boulter is said to have often appeared astonished when
he heard gentlemen talk as if they were determined to destroy
the Irish seat of learning. It is added that “many did this for
the purpose of injuring religion.” No doubt the true explanation
of the animosity to the College is to be sought in the strong
political feelings which prevailed at the time. The Fellows were
mainly Whigs, and their opponents belonged to the Tory party.
Early in March, 1734/5, the Visitors cited the Provost, Fellows,
and Scholars to appear at a Visitation on the 20th of that month.
Primate Boulter wrote to the Duke of Dorset that--
There have been such difficulties started from the College,
and so much listened to by their Vice-Chancellor, the Bishop
of Clogher [Dr. Stearne], that I fear the Visitation will
not prove such as will answer expectation. I have taken all
opportunities of desiring the Fellows and their friends to
avoid all needless disputes and oppositions for fear of their
falling into the hands of worse Visitors next Session of
Parliament. I hope and fear the best; but things do not promise
very well.
The above cited pamphlet states that “at the late inquiry into
the condition of the College, there could not be discovered more
than two or three insignificant points in which the Statutes were
deviated from by the Fellows.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account