Fifteen years after the publication of "De Præstigiis," appeared
Jean Bodin's counterblast. The eminent jurist was well qualified to
speak, having done some persecuting on his own account and thus gained
first-hand experience of the ways and customs of the witch. To him
the theories of Wierus appeared as those either of a very ignorant
or of a very wicked man. The suggestion that witches and sorcerers
should be pitied rather than punished appeared to him to aim a blow
at the very framework of society, human and divine, and he felt it
his duty to refute Wierus and all his works, "not through hatred, but
primarily for the honour of God." He also gives detailed accounts of
the various kinds of witches, but unlike Wierus discreetly refrains
from setting down the spells and invocations to the Devil with which
he is acquainted, lest, falling into the hands of the evilly disposed,
improper use be made of them. For such crimes as those habitually
committed by witches he can find no penalty severe enough, while as to
Wierus' plea that allowance be made for the weakness of women he quotes
approvingly the law, that "the punishment for witchcraft shall not be
diminished for women as is the case in all other crimes."
England was in no way singular from the rest of Europe in her method
of approaching the question, though her persecutions were on a smaller
scale. The Act of 1541 whereby various kinds of sorcery, such as the
destruction of a neighbour's goods or person, the making of images or
pictures of men, women, children, angels, devils, beasts and fowls
for magical purposes, were declared felony without benefit of clergy,
was repealed in the reign of Edward VI. Another, distinguishing the
various grades of witchcraft, was passed in 1562. By it, conjurations,
invocations of evil spirits, the practice of sorceries, enchantments,
charms and witchcrafts whereby deaths resulted were declared felony,
without benefit of clergy, and punishable with death. If only
bodily harm ensued, the penalty for the first offence was a year's
imprisonment and exposure in the pillory, and for the second, death.
Notwithstanding such laws, the highest in the land were not averse
to personal dealings with followers of the black art. Queen Elizabeth
herself so far exercised her royal prerogative as to have been--unless
rumour lie--on excellent terms with Dr. John Dee, the eminent
crystal-gazer, whose "black stone" is now in the British Museum. In
Scotland the principal Act was passed in 1563. By it the practice of
witchcraft, sorcery and necromancy, the pretence of possessing magical
knowledge, and the seeking of help from witches were declared capital
offences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account