Yet another case, tried before Holt, was that of Elizabeth Horner at
Exeter, in 1696. Three children of one William Borch were said to have
been bewitched by her. One had died, the leg of another was twisted,
all had vomited pins, been bitten, pricked, and pinched. Their mother
deposed "that one of them walked up a smooth plaistered Wall till her
Feet were nine foot high, her Head standing off from it. This," she
said, "she did five or six times, and laughed and said Bess Horner held
her up." Poor Elizabeth had a wart on her shoulder, which the children
said was a witch-mark, and was sucked by her toad. But the Lord
Chief Justice seems to have been of another opinion, for he directed
the jury to acquit her. Indeed, of all the many cases of witchcraft
brought before him, not one prisoner was convicted--a state of things
which would certainly have resulted in a question being asked in
Parliament had it happened in our time. The last woman found guilty of
witchcraft in this country was Jane Wenham, the Witch of Walkerne, in
Hertfordshire, who was tried in 1712. The witch-finder was called into
requisition, and she was submitted to the usual inane and degrading
tests. "They either did themselves or suffered others that were about
them to scratch and tear her face and run Pins into her Flesh. They
... turned the Lord's Prayer into a Charm"--(the Vicar of Ardely was
responsible for this part of the performance, by the way). "They turned
to Spectre Evidence, they drave her to such Distraction that by leading
Questions they drew from her what they called a Confession. They had
her to Jail. The witnesses swore to vomiting Pins. The Jury found her
Guilty, the Judge condemned her, and those clergymen wrote a Narrative
of the Tryal, which was received and read with such Pleasure that in a
Month's Time it had a Fourth Edition." But Jane Wenham was fortunate in
her judge. Being a man of learning and experience, "he Valued not those
Tricks and Tryals, and though he was forced to condemn her because
a Silly Jury would find her guilty, he saved her Life. And that she
might not afterwards be torn to pieces in an ignorant Town, a sensible
Gentleman, who will for ever be in Honour for what he did, Colonel
Plummer of Gilston, in the same County, took her into his protection
and placed her in a little house near his own, where she now lives
soberly and inoffensively, and keeps her church, and the whole county
is now fully convinced that she was innocent, and that the Maid that
was thought to be bewitched was an Idle Hussy ... and was well as soon
as her sweetheart came and married her."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account