The Booke of the Universall Kirk of Scotland: Wherein the Headis and Conclusionis Devysit Be the Ministers and Commissionaris of the Particular Kirks Thereof, Are Specially Expressed and Contained.
History
The Booke of the Universall Kirk of Scotland: Wherein the Headis and Conclusionis Devysit Be the Ministers and Commissionaris of the Particular Kirks Thereof, Are Specially Expressed and Contained.
Church of Scotland -- History -- Sources
“In these circumstances, the General Assembly have deemed it
necessary, as a last resource, to make an application to Parliament
by petition, in the hope that some means may be devised by the wisdom
of the Legislature, for relieving the Members of Sion College from
the restraint under which they feel themselves, and enabling them
to do that which they must, as an act of justice, wish to do,--to
restore to the Church of Scotland these ancient Records, which,
however acquired by the College, the Church of Scotland still
consider to be their own property.
“JOHN LEE, Cl. Eccl. Scot.
“55, PARLIAMENT STREET, WESTMINSTER,
_June 20_, 1828.”
The authenticity and authority of “The Booke,” as now for the first
time fully printed from the copies in the Advocates’ Library, (so
far as it exists in a continuous and connected form,) becomes,
since the originals are lost, a subject of grave inquiry. It is
our purpose, in the Notes and Illustrations to be appended to the
present Edition, to collect and point out all the evidence attainable
on this point--to supply from other sources the portions which are
wanting in the text--and to note any seeming discrepancies among
the several transcripts and Abbreviates. This must necessarily be
a work of careful research and considerable labour; requiring some
time for its accomplishment. In the meanwhile, however, we may state
briefly some of the leading evidences of authenticity on which we
rely, in concluding, that what is now printed possesses a character
of authenticity.
1. The Acts of Assembly, 1638, and subsequent years, (which are of
unquestioned authenticity,) approve of, reiterate, and re-enact many
of the most important statutes contained in the old Registers, which
those Assemblies had in their possession; and these, as re-enacted,
coincide, so far as they go, with the terms of the original Acts as
now printed.[4]
2. In Collier’s Ecclesiastical History of Great Britain, we find
a most important corroboration to the same effect. He was a
contemporary of Archibald Campbell, already referred to, and had
access to the original Registers recently burnt, as appears from
numerous marginal references to and quotations from them. Thus (vol.
ii. p. 700) he refers to “MS. Acts of the Assembly, _penes_ Mr
Archibald Campbell, Armig.;” and there are very many other references
to the same MS. record,[5] as the source whence he derived numerous
Acts and documents embodied in his work. These, too, substantially
and closely, coincide with the text as now published.
3. Archbishop Spottiswood, in his History, (and he had full access to
the original records,) in like manner transfers many extracts to his
pages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account