The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introductionElmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
History
The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introduction
Elmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
Bible. Chronicles -- Commentaries
³⁷and Moza begat Binea; Raphah¹ was his son, Eleasah his son,
Azel his son: ³⁸and Azel had six sons, whose names are these;
Azrikam, Bocheru, and Ishmael, and Sheariah, and Obadiah, and
Hanan. All these were the sons of Azel. ³⁹And the sons of Eshek
his brother; Ulam his firstborn, Jeush the second, and Eliphelet
the third. ⁴⁰And the sons of Ulam were mighty men of valour,
archers, and had many sons, and sons’ sons, an hundred and fifty.
All these were of the sons of Benjamin.
¹ In chapter ix. 43, _Rephaiah_.
=37.= _Raphah_] In ix. 43, _Rephaiah_.
CHAPTER IX.
=1‒17= (compare Nehemiah xi. 1‒19).
THE HEADS OF THE FAMILIES WHICH DWELT IN JERUSALEM.
Verses 2‒17 contain the lists of the heads of families of Judah
(=3‒6=), of Benjamin (=7‒9=), of the priests (=10‒13=), of the Levites
(= 14‒16=), and of the porters (=17=), who dwelt in Jerusalem at some
period after the Return (compare note on verse 2). A similar list (with
some variations which are recorded in their places in the following
notes) occurs in Nehemiah xi. 3‒19. The partial agreement coupled with
the partial divergence of the two lists may be explained by supposing
that both are extracts independently made from the same document, and
have been inserted, one in Chronicles, the other in Nehemiah, lest
the peculiarities of either list should be lost. We may conclude from
Nehemiah xi. 1, 2 that both lists represent the population of Jerusalem,
after Nehemiah had taken measures for increasing it. Another way of
accounting for the divergences in the two lists is to suppose that the
present list represents the Jerusalem of a later period than the list
in Nehemiah See also verse 17.
¹So all Israel were reckoned by genealogies; and, behold, they
are written in the book of the kings of Israel: and Judah was
carried away captive to Babylon for their transgression.
=1.= _in the book of the kings of Israel_] See Introduction § 5, B (3).
The LXX., however, reads “in the book of the kings of Israel _and
Judah_.” With the LXX. reading, _all Israel_ must be taken as subject
of the verb _was carried away_, but of course the phrase must still be
taken as meaning an “Israel” = Judah.
²Now the first inhabitants that dwelt in their possessions in
their cities were, Israel, the priests, the Levites, and the
Nethinim.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account