The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introductionElmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
History
The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introduction
Elmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
Bible. Chronicles -- Commentaries
=2.= _killed sheep and oxen_] This phrase implies a _feast_, for flesh
is eaten in the East only on festal occasions. The phrase used for
supplying necessary food is _to set bread and water before one_.
_Ramoth-gilead_] Deuteronomy iv. 43; 1 Kings iv. 13, xxii. 3;
2 Kings viii. 28, ix. 1 and 14. Ramoth was a city of refuge and (under
Solomon) the seat of the governor of a province. Probably it was the
most important Israelite city east of Jordan. Its site has not been
certainly identified (see Barnes’ note on 1 Kings iv. 13). Probably it
was on the Yarmuk near Edrei. In 1 Chronicles vi. 80 it is mentioned as
a city assigned to the sons of Merari. Apparently it was captured from
Israel by the Syrians in the time of Baasha or of Omri, and was not
restored in accordance with the treaty referred to in 1 Kings xx. 34.
³And Ahab king of Israel said unto Jehoshaphat king of Judah,
Wilt thou go with me to Ramoth-gilead? And he answered him, I am
as thou art, and my people as thy people; and _we will be_ with
thee in the war.
=3.= _and_ we will be _with thee in the war_] In 1 Kings the
corresponding phrase is, _my horses as thy horses_. The phrases in
1 Kings need not be more than the expression of oriental politeness.
At the present day the Arab says to his guest, _My house is thy house_,
but he generally means very little by the words. The Chronicler,
however, interpreting by the event, turns the vaguer phrase of Kings
into a definite promise.
=4‒27= (= 1 Kings xxii. 5‒28).
THE PROPHECY OF MICAIAH.
This narrative, apart from its intrinsic interest, is of great value
for the welcome light it throws upon the prophets in Israel. The direct
references of the later Prophets have accustomed us to the thought that
_they_ had to contend with unworthy representatives of their calling.
Here we are made to realise with peculiar vividness that even in the
early stages of the national history the false prophet was a menace
to Israel’s spiritual enlightenment. Micaiah spake few words, yet he
deserves to rank with the great Prophets. He resembles them at least
in his overmastering conviction of the truth and in his resolution to
proclaim it, whatever cost of personal suffering it may entail. His
opponents were professedly servants of Jehovah, and it is noteworthy
that Micaiah does not accuse them of deliberate intent to deceive Ahab
but rather of self-deception and ignorance of the truth (verse 21).
Their ignorance of course was blameworthy, for it was due to their
willingness to prophesy smooth things: they lacked that utter integrity
of heart and entire devotion to his prophetic calling which Micaiah
possessed.
⁴And Jehoshaphat said unto the king of Israel, Inquire, I pray
thee, at the word of the LORD to-day.
=4.= _Jehoshaphat_] Compare 1 Kings iii. 11.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account