The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
(_d_) _The Sadducæan attitude regarding Belief in the existence of
Angels and Spirits._
In Acts xxiii. 8 it is said that “the Sadducees say that there is no
resurrection, neither angel nor spirit”; this is the only authority
which we have on the latter point; it is not referred to either in
Josephus’ works or in the Talmud, nor have the _Zadokite Fragments_
anything to say about it. Now since the Sadducees regarded the
written Law as their final authority, it would certainly have been
strange if they had really denied the existence of angels, for one
has but to recall such passages as Genesis xvi. 1 ff., xxviii. 10
ff., Numbers xx. 16, xxii. 22 ff., and others, to realize that
the written Law distinctly teaches a doctrine of angels. One has,
therefore, to recognize the possibility that what is said on this
subject in Acts xxiii. 8 may be due to a mistaken inference derived
from the Sadducæan disbelief in the resurrection, namely, that the
_departed_ do not become angels or spirits[187]; this does not
necessarily deny the existence of angelic beings who have never been
in the flesh.[188]
(_e_) _The Doctrine of the Messiah._
One other specifically Sadducæan doctrine must be briefly mentioned,
namely that of the Messiah. As against the Pharisees, who taught that
the Messiah was to be of the seed of David, and who thus held the old
prophetic belief of Isaiah and Jeremiah, the Sadducees, regarding the
Pentateuchal Law as the supreme arbiter in all matters, and finding
nothing there which spoke of the Messianic ruler as belonging to the
house of David, held that Aaron and his seed were the chosen ones
from whom the Messiah would ultimately proceed; it was with Phinehas,
the grandson of Aaron, that God had made an eternal covenant; and,
therefore, as Ezekiel (xliv. 15 ff.) had prophesied, the sons of
Zadok[189] were to be the rulers of the people, and the Messiah must
be of priestly blood (cp. Exod. xix. 6).[190] So that, as Leszynsky
points out (p. 94), the very name of the Sadducæan party, i.e. the
Zadokites (the descendants of Zadok) also had a place in the strife
regarding the Torah _versus_ Tradition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account