The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
In the _Zadokite Fragments_ the teaching concerning the Messiah is
important; there is frequent reference to a “Teacher” who is called
the “Only Teacher,” or the “Only One,” and is identical with “the
Lawgiver who interprets the Law.” There is a period intervening
before the first appearance of this Teacher, who was the Founder of
the Sect, and his second appearance, which is to be at “the end of
the days.” Now this Teacher is identified with the Messiah, “the
Anointed One from Aaron and Israel, whose advent is expected by the
Sect, through whom He made them to know His holy spirit, and in whose
rise the Sect saw the fulfilment of the prophecy, _there shall come
a star out of Jacob_. Apparently this Anointed One was rejected by
the great bulk of the nation who ‘spoke rebellion’ against Him. What
must be especially noted is that the Messiah of the Sect is a priest,
a descendant from Aaron and Israel. Of a Messiah descending from
Judah there is no mention in our text. Indeed, ‘after the completing
of the end ... one shall not join the house of Judah,’ whilst the
princes of Judah, the removers of the bound, will be visited by the
wrath of God. Among these princes, King David is also included,
who is held in slight estimation by the Sect. As a contrast to and
substitute for David and his dynasty, the Sect put up Zadok, and
his descendants, the sons of Zadok.”[191] There is nothing which so
stamps the character of these fragments as just this doctrine of the
Messiah.
(_f_) _The Sadducees and the Jewish Calendar._
This is a somewhat intricate subject; but the main point is that the
Sadducees held that time must be measured on the basis of a solar
year; they thus opposed the Pharisaic mode of reckoning which was
on the basis of the lunar year. The Pharisees followed the ancient
Hebrew tradition; but the unsatisfactory character of this mode
of reckoning time must have been realized in early times; and the
Pharisees, in getting over the obvious difficulties by inserting a
thirteenth month in the spring whenever necessary, were following
the oral Tradition. This was sufficient for the opposition of the
Sadducees who sought to reform the Calendar by measuring time on the
basis of the solar year. The Sadducees and Pharisees accordingly
accused each other of observing feasts at a wrong time,[192] or of
wishing to.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account