The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
[LITERATURE.—Droysen, _Geschichte des Hellenismus_ (3rd ed.,
1877); Schürer, _A History of the Jewish People in the Time of
Jesus Christ_, II, i. pp. 1-149 (1890-1891), German ed. II,
pp. 1-267 (1901-1909); Usener, _Götternamen_ (1896); Kaerst,
_Geschichte des hellenistischen Zeitalters_ (1901, 1909); Zeller,
_Die Philosophie der Griechen_, III, i. ii. (4th ed., 1903,
1909); Zeller, _Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy_
(Engl. ed., 1909); Rohde, _Psyche_ (3rd ed., 1903); Edwyn Bevan,
_Jerusalem under the High-priests_ (1904); M. Friedländer,
_Griechische Philosophie im Alten Testament_ (1904); Gruppe,
_Griechische Mythologie und Religionsgeschichte_ (1906); Mahaffy,
_The Silver Age of the Greek World_ (1906); Krüger, _Hellenismus
und Judenthum im neutestamentlichen Zeitalter_ (1908); Farnell,
_Greek Religion_ (1912); Wendland, _Die Hellenistisch-Römische
Kultur in ihren Beziehungen zu Judentum und Christentum_ (1912);
Edwyn Bevan, _Stoics and Sceptics_ (1913); Farnell’s art. on
“Greek Religion” in Hastings’ _Dict. of Religion and Ethics_.]
To offer in any detail an account of such an immense subject as the
Hellenistic Movement would be out of the question here; but no study
which has to do with Jewish religion or culture of the three last
pre-Christian centuries can be taken in hand without some reference
to the Movement which so profoundly affected the world of those
times. The object of the present chapter is, therefore, to indicate
the main directions in which Hellenistic influence was exercised;
so much is essential when it is remembered that the books of the
Apocrypha form an integral part of the Greek Old Testament, which is
itself one of the most striking products of the Hellenistic Movement
in the domain of literature.
A word must be said at the outset regarding the use of the terms
_Hellenic_ and _Hellenistic_. It is not always easy to be strictly
logical or consistent in the way in which one employs these; the
fundamental difference between the two is this: _Hellenic culture_
refers, of course, to the pure Greek civilization, religion, etc.,
existing previous to the coming of Alexander the Great; _Hellenistic
culture_ refers to this civilization as it appeared after having
absorbed numerous elements in the domain both of thought and religion
from non-Greek sources after the coming of Alexander the Great.
Hellenistic culture exercised a greater and wider influence upon the
world than Hellenic, because by absorbing alien elements it was able
to become a world-culture. The terms have thus a distinct and clearly
defined difference. But inasmuch as Hellenistic culture is based upon
and has as its chief characteristic Hellenic culture, it is sometimes
convenient to use the terms Hellenism and Hellenic in a wide and
inclusive sense; as so used it is equivalent to the term _Greek_,
without restriction to any particular age.
I. HELLENISM IN ITS SECULAR ASPECT
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account