The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
In his Prologue to the Greek translation of the book Ben-Sira’s
grandson tells us that “in the eight and thirtieth year under
Euergetes the king, having come into Egypt and continued there, I
found opportunity for no small instruction. I, therefore, deemed it
most necessary myself to devote some zeal and love-labour to (the
task of) translating this book; devoting, indeed, much watchful
care and skill during the time at my disposal in order that, having
completed the book (i.e. its translation), I might publish it for
the benefit of those who in the land of their sojourning were
desirous to learn, being already prepared in respect of their moral
culture to live by the Law.” Those words enable us to fix the date,
approximately, of the translation of the book; for there was only
one Egyptian king of the name of Euergetes to whom the translator’s
words could apply, namely Euergetes II, surnamed Physcon, who reigned
altogether fifty-four years; first he was joint-ruler with his elder
brother, Philometor (B.C. 170-145), and then he reigned alone (B.C.
145-116).[348] The thirty-eighth year of his reign would be B.C.
132; soon after this date, therefore, the Greek translation was
made. Having got this date it is not difficult to fix an approximate
date for the original work; it would be about fifty or sixty years
earlier. At the end of chapter xlix. and beginning of l., according
to the Hebrew of our book, it says:
Great among his brethren, and the glory of his people
Was Simeon, the son of Jochanan, the priest.
This Simeon, the second of the name, was high-priest from B.C.
219-199; Ben-Sira was clearly a contemporary of his (see l. 1 ff.),
but the way in which he writes about him suggests that Simeon must
have been dead some time when Ben-Sira wrote; we shall, therefore,
not be far wrong in assigning the year B.C. 180, or thereabouts, as
the date of the composition of the book in its original form. It is,
however, certain that the book was in preparation for some years
before this; for since, as we have already seen, Ben-Sira had his own
house of instruction where he gave lectures to his pupils, we may
justly assume that the contents of his book represent the pith of
these lectures.
IV. THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE OF THE BOOK; THE RECENTLY FOUND HEBREW
MANUSCRIPTS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account