The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
Apart from the fact that a large portion (about two-thirds) of our
book has in recent years been found in Hebrew, which very often gives
the original form, the following considerations made it certain, even
before this was found, that the original language was Hebrew: in his
Prologue to the book the translator says: “Things originally spoken
in Hebrew have not the same force in them when they are translated
into another tongue; and not only these, but the Law itself, and
the Prophecies, and the rest of the books, have no small difference
when they are spoken in their original form.” Although he does not
actually say so, it is pretty obvious that Ben-Sira’s grandson
implies here that he translated his grandfather’s book from Hebrew.
In the second place, in St. Jerome’s time it would appear that Hebrew
manuscripts of the book existed in Palestine, for in his preface to
the Books of Solomon he says that he found the book of Jesus the son
of Sirach in Hebrew. Then, again, in later times Saadiah (A.D. 920)
speaks of the existence of copies of the Hebrew text, and he says
that the vowel-points were added, which was, as a rule, only done in
the case of canonical books.[349] And lastly, in a number of cases
the renderings of the Greek necessitate the assumption that they were
translated from Hebrew.
But all doubt, where such existed, was set at rest by the discovery
(1896-1900) of a number of fragments of the Hebrew text. Those to
whom this important find, or rather series of finds, is due are Mrs.
Lewis and Mrs. Gibson, Cowley and Neubauer, Schechter and Taylor,
G. Margoliouth, Levi, Adler, and Gaster. Altogether about thirty
leaves were found; they are fragments belonging to four different
manuscripts, and they all came from the Genizah of a synagogue in
Cairo. As all these manuscripts are written on paper and not on
vellum they cannot be earlier than the ninth century A.D., for paper
was not introduced until this century[350]; they all belong probably
to the end of the tenth or the beginning of the eleventh century.[351]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account