The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
From what has been said it is evident that Hellenistic influence
upon the Jews of Palestine was very marked, for although it is
difficult, perhaps impossible, to trace step by step the progress
of this influence from its inception, we are able to see plainly
enough how profoundly it must have affected the Jews. The question,
however, arises as to whether the religious beliefs of the Jews were
influenced by Hellenism. That a large number of Jews prior to the
Maccabæan struggle gave up their traditional belief in their pursuit
after everything that was Greek is clear from the evidence of the
books of the Maccabees; but the point is rather as to whether Judaism
as a faith was in any way permanently affected by the Hellenistic
spirit. Restricting ourselves at present to Palestinian Judaism we
may say without hesitation that its fundamental tenets remained
untouched; but as regards various beliefs which, in process of
time, became part and parcel of Judaism, it was different; it cannot
be denied that these, of which mention will be made presently, do
witness to the action of extraneous influences, permanent in their
effect, of which Hellenism was one. “In no period,” says Wellhausen,
“was Judaism so fruitful as in this. It was, like Islam, of complex
appearance, full of antinomies, receptive like all that is living,
unsystematic, only to be understood in its historical setting. It was
only practical religion which was ruled by a pedantic spirit and by
strict discipline; in the domain of belief and religious conception a
curious freedom was permitted, although certain fundamental doctrines
were rigorously shielded.”[38] The difficulty of estimating to
what extent Jewish religious thought and practice were affected by
outside influences is very considerable; not less difficult is it to
determine _what_ outside influence had affected a given belief or
custom. We are dealing specifically with Hellenistic influences, but
these could be, and were, exercised both directly and indirectly. It
must be remembered that the conditions under which the Jews lived
during the period with which we are dealing, viz., in the midst
of surrounding nations which had all, more or less, come under
Hellenistic influences, and among whom the development of culture and
religion had been, and was, proceeding apace—it must be remembered
that these conditions were one of the consequences of the Hellenistic
Movement.[39] Further, the question must always be borne in mind as
to whether some eastern _trait_ which was absorbed by Judaism had not
first been assimilated by Hellenism with its strongly syncretistic
tendency, and then taken up by Judaism through this Greek channel.
Even in the cases in which eastern elements were directly taken up
into Judaism, must we not see in such Jewish syncretism at any
rate the indirect result of Hellenistic influence? This readiness
to accept what other religions had to offer was of the essence of
the Hellenistic spirit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account