The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
The evidence of the Prologue to the Greek translation of
Ecclesiasticus, some sixty years later, points also to a veneration
of the Law, but without making any reference to the oral Law,
although it is probable that scribes are in the mind of the writer of
the Prologue when he speaks of “readers” and “lovers of learning who
must be able to profit them which are without [i.e. the laity, most
likely] both by speaking and writing.” The Prologue thus corroborates
what we learn from the book itself.
Before coming to 1 Maccabees, which is the next book to give evidence
on the subject of the Scribes, a word must be said about the
_Assidæans_, or _Chassidim_.[148] By these are meant those “Pious”
ones, frequently mentioned in some of the later Psalms (e.g., cxlix.
1-9, and elsewhere), who clung tenaciously to the Law, both written
and oral, when, in the third century B.C. onwards, many of the
Jews were becoming lax owing, largely, to Hellenistic influences.
They were animated by a strong antipathy towards everyone who was
Hellenistically inclined; they were legalists in the strictest sense
of the word, and particularists. Although in existence beforehand, it
was only during the Maccabæan struggle that they commenced to play an
important _rôle_ in the political life of the nation. The importance
of the _Chassidim_ for our present study is that they are identified
with one type of the scribes in 1 Maccabees vii. 12, 13, viz.: “And
there was gathered together unto Alcimus[149] and Bacchides[150] a
company of scribes to seek for justice; and the _Chassidim_ were the
first among the children of Israel that sought peace of them [i.e.,
of Alcimus and Bacchides].” The evidence of this book appears at
first sight to be conflicting, for in the passage just cited they
appear as the peaceful party, while in ii. 43, 44 they are described
as warlike.[151] It is probable, however, that these descriptions
both witness to the true facts of the case; for the natural
inclination of these students and strict observers of the Law would
clearly lie in the direction of peace; but as soon as they realized
that the cherished object of their existence was imperilled, fighting
became a necessity. It must be remembered that the _Chassidim_ and
the Maccabees are in no sense to be identified; they were both
champions of the Law, and both the enemies of Hellenistic Jews; but
the Maccabees were patriots primarily, while the _Chassidim_ were
legalists, and, provided they were left in peace to follow their
legal studies and observances, it was of no great moment to them
whether their nation was independent or a subject-race.
In the Book of Judith, although the Scribes are never mentioned, many
details of what were really the results of their activity are to be
found; but as these are spoken of in Part II in the account there
given of the Book of Judith (§ iii.), we need not make any further
reference to the subject here.
(_c_) _Some further particulars._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account