The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
One or two other points regarding the Scribes may be briefly
mentioned. As exponents of the Law and of the Scriptures generally
the Scribes were as a matter of course greatly occupied with the
Hebrew text of these; they thus became, quite apart from their other
duties, such as making copies of the Scriptures, the guardians of the
text of Scripture, and upon them devolved the further duty of the
fixing and the preservation of the Biblical text. This very important
function marks them out as the beginners of the textual criticism of
the Old Testament.
A further practical duty which the study and exposition of the Law
brought with it was that of administering it. The Scribe was a
lawyer; in the Gospels the two terms are synonymous, for which reason
they never occur together. It was as administrators of the Law that
the Scribes were represented in the Sanhedrin at Jerusalem; here
they sat as judges who assisted in the passing of sentences on those
who had broken the Law.[152]
After definite parties had come into existence the Scribes belonged,
in the main, to the Pharisaic party; but there was no reason against
some of them being members of the Sadducæan party; this is, indeed,
implied in such passages as Mark ii. 16; Luke v. 30; Acts xxiii. 9.
That which constituted the difference between the Scribes and the
Pharisees was briefly this: the Scribes handed down the traditional,
i.e. the oral, Law as well as the written Law, and explained it; the
Pharisees carried out in actual practice what was thus prescribed.
This, of course, does not mean to say that the Scribes did not also
strictly observe the legal enactments; but that their special duties
constituted them a class distinct from the Pharisees is clear from
the way in which they are differentiated in the New Testament, for
there we read of the “Scribes of the Pharisees” (Mark ii. 16; Acts
xxiii. 9), and of “the Pharisees and their scribes” (Luke v. 30),
showing clearly that the Scribes were distinct from the Pharisees.
The natural sequel to any account of the Scribes is a consideration
of the Pharisees; with these, in conjunction with the Sadducees, we
shall deal in the next chapter.
SUMMARY
From the Old Testament _data_ we gather that there were Scribes
who were occupied with the written Law in pre-exilic times, though
they arose long subsequently to the priests, the prophets, and the
_Chakamim_, or wise men; but the pre-exilic scribe was of a very
different kind from the scribe of later times. Ezra was not only
the first scribe in the later sense of the word, but was also the
inaugurator of the scribal system as generally understood.
An important point to notice in the activity of the Scribes in the
earliest post-exilic period is that as teachers of the Law they
interpreted it to the people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account