The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
In 1842, experiments were made with iron plates three-eighths of an
inch thick, rivetted together to make a total thickness of six inches.
It was, however, reported that at 400 yards these were not proof
against eight-inch guns or heavy thirty-two pounders. These matters
were taken into consideration by Captain Chads, whose official report
was as follows:--
“The shot going through the exposed or near side generally makes a
clean smooth hole of its own size, which might be readily stopped;
and even where it strikes a rib it has much the same effect; but on
the opposite side all the mischief occurs; the shot meets with so
little resistance that it must inevitably go through the vessel,
and should it strike on a rib on the opposite side the effect
is terrific, tearing off the iron sheets to a very considerable
extent; and even those shot that go clean through the fracture
being on the off side, the rough edges are outside the vessel,
precluding the possibility almost of stopping them.
“As it is most probable that steam vessels will engage directly
end-on I have thought it desirable to try to-day what the effect of
shot would be on this vessel[83] so placed, and it has been such as
might be expected, each shot cutting aways the ribs, and tearing
the iron plates away sufficient to sink the vessel in an instant.”
[Illustration: THE _LONDON_--TWO DECKER WOODEN CONVERTED SCREW SHIP OF
THE LINE.
Designed by Sir William Symonds. Launched 1840. Damaged at the
bombardment of Fort Constantine, Sevastopol, 1854. Turned into hulk at
Zanzibar, 1874.]
In 1849 an official report stated that:--
“Shot of every description in passing through iron makes such large
holes that the material is improper for the bottom of ships.
“Iron and oak of equal weight offering equal resistance to shot,
iron for the topsides affords better protection for the men than
oak, as the splinters from it are not so destructive.
“Iron offering no lodgment for shells in passing through the side,
if made with single plates it will be free from the destructive
effects that would occur by a shell exploding in a side of timber.”
Certain modifications were then introduced and tried in the year 1850,
and Captain Chad’s report was that:--
“With high charges the splinters from the shot were as numerous and
as severe as before, with the addition in this, and in the former
case, of the evils that other vessels are subject to, that of the
splinters from the timber.
“From these circumstances I am confirmed in the opinion that iron
cannot be beneficially employed as a material for the construction
of vessels of war.”
As a result of this report, seventeen iron ships which were building,
the largest being the _Simoon_, of nearly 2,000 tons, were condemned;
and it was definitely decided that ships must be built of wood, and
that iron in any form was disadvantageous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account