The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The advantages of the shell were fully understood, and at least half
of the guns of the ships of the line of the period were sixty-five
cwt. shell guns. Experiments had fully taught what shell-fire might be
expected to accomplish. General Paixham, the inventor of the shell gun,
had long ago stated that armour was the only antidote to shell, and the
fact that armour up to six inches had been experimented with indicates
that this also was understood. Between the appreciation of the fact
and acting upon it, there was, however, a decided gulf. In the British
Navy, as in others also, the natural conservatism of the sea held its
usual sway.
Matters were at about this stage when, in the year 1853, the Russian
Admiral Nachimoff, with a fleet consisting of six ships of the line,
entered the harbour of Sinope, on the 30th November, 1853, and
absolutely annihilated, by shell fire, a Turkish squadron of seven
frigates which were lying there. The damage wrought by this shell-fire
was terrific. “For God’s sake keep out the shells!” is generally
believed to have been the cry of most naval officers about that period,
though there is some lack of evidence as to whether this demand was
ever actually made, except by the Press. The terrible effect of
shell-fire was, however, obvious enough; but as stated above it was
really well-known before the war test that so impressed the world.
When the Crimean War broke out in 1854, the British _personnel_ stood
at 45,500, and the Estimates were £7,197,804. On the 28th March, war
was formally declared. Naval operations in the Crimean war were almost
entirely of secondary note. Some frigates bombarded Odessa, in April,
and a certain amount of damage was done along the Caucasian coast.
In September, the British fleet, consisting of ten ships of the line,
two frigates and thirteen armed steamers, convoyed an enormous fleet
of Turkish and French warships crammed with troops for an attack on
Sebastopol. The Russian fleet lay inside that harbour and made no
attempt whatever to destroy the invading flotilla, though it might
easily have done considerable mischief, if not more. Instead of that,
the ships were sunk at the entrance of the harbour, and the siege of
Sebastopol presently commenced. On October 17th, the Allied fleet
attempted to bombard Fort Constantine, but the ships were soon defeated
by the shore defences and many of them badly injured.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account