The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
=WAIST.=--That portion of a ship on the upper deck between the
forecastle and quarter deck.
=WATER-TUBE BOILER.=--A boiler in which the water is contained in tubes
round which the hot gases circulate.
=WAY (Momentum).=--It is important to note the difference between this
and the term “_weigh_,” the two being very often confounded. A vessel
in motion is said to have “way” on her; and when she ceases to move to
have “no way.” But a vessel under weigh in one not at anchor or secured
to the shore.
=WEATHER-SIDE.=--The side on which the wind blows.
=WEEPING (or Sweating).=--Drops of water oozing through the sides of a
vessel or caused by condensation on the surface of the beams, etc.
=WEIGH.=--To lift the anchor from the ground.
=WIRE-WOUND.=--All big British guns are made by winding miles of
steel wire or ribbon round a tube over which the exterior tubes are
afterwards shrunk.
=YARD.=--A spar suspended to a mast for the purpose of hoisting or
extending a sail, or to which signal halyards can be taken.
From “The Navy League Annual,” by the courtesy of
Alan H. Burgoyne, Esq., M.P.
Netherwood, Dalton & Co., Rashcliffe, Huddersfield.
FOOTNOTES
[1] All statements as to King Alfred’s navy are taken directly from the
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Asser, and Florence of Worcester.
[2] An interpolated passage
[3] Wace.
[4] Guyot de Provins _ex_ Nicholas.
[5] _ex_ Nicolas.
[6] Henry VIII introduced a new form of warship in the “pinnaces,”
which were, to a certain extent, analogous to the torpedo craft of
to-day.
[7] Records of the Drake family.
[8] The italics are mine.--F.T.J.
[9] So far as I am aware nothing about this appears in any official
account. I have no Japanese confirmation, but accounts gleaned at the
time from the Russian auxiliaries--who, being foreigners had no object
in lying--make it perfectly clear to my mind that the Russian admirals
believed that the Japanese were astern of them till they met them at
Tsushima. It is the only logical explanation of why Rodjestvensky
essayed the narrow passage with his best ships, when he could equally
well have gone round Japan with them unopposed, and so secured at
Vladivostok that refit of which he was so much in need.
[10] It was badly weather-beaten, of course, and in sore straits on
account of its lengthy voyage.
[11] In 1620 the first submarine appeared. It was invented by a Dutch
physician, C. Van Drebel; and James I went for a lengthy underwater
trip in a larger replica.--See _Submarine Navigation_, by Alan H.
Burgoyne.
[12] In this connection, _see_ The First Dutch War, a few pages further
on.
[13] It is interesting to note that this particular argument, seemingly
rather hyperbolical to-day on account of railways, is so _only if the
hostile ships can be kept under observation_.
[14] This practice appears to have been allowed to die out. At any rate
it was re-introduced in the time of Queen Anne.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account