The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
During this war the usual complaints about ships’ bottoms were made,
especially from the West Indian Station; and in October, 1761, the
Admiralty ordered a frigate to be sheathed with thin sheets of copper
as an experiment. This was at first found extremely successful, but
after the lapse of a few years it was noted that chemical action had
set up between the copper and the iron bolts at the ships’ bottom--most
of these bolts being rusted away.
Experiments were, however, continued, since, though the life of a
copper bottom was but three to four years, its general advantages were
very great. Ultimately iron bolts were abandoned in favour of copper
ones. The cost of this came to £2,272 for a ship of the first-rate, and
was only relatively satisfactory.
Ever since the Treaty of Paris in 1763, friction had been growing
between the Home Country and the North American Colonies. The causes
which led to it concern the British Navy only in so far as it was used
for the harsh enforcement of the regulations entailed by the Treaty in
question--regulations which bore heavily on the Colonists. The rest of
the story is merely the tale of political incapacity at home.
The American Colonists, in addition to a few fast sailing frigates
which they handled with unexpected aptitude, possessed a so very
considerable mercantile fleet that it was estimated that 18,000 of
their seamen had served in the English ships in the late war with
France. Consequently, the Colonists were in a position to fit our
privateers, and with these, in the first eight years of the war, they
captured nearly 1,000 English merchant ships. Their own losses were,
however, greater, and it is probable that despite all the military
blunders which characterised English conduct of the war, the Colonists
would eventually have been worn down but for the active intervention of
France in 1778, and Spain a little later.
As regards naval operations against the Americans themselves, these
were mainly in the nature of sea transport. Where they were otherwise,
they were of an inglorious nature, owing to the total inability of the
Home Government to appreciate the position. The naval story of the war
is, in the main, the story of frigates attempting difficult channels,
and going aground in the attempt. It is of interest mainly because in
1776 one David Bushnell made the first submarine ever actually used in
war, and attempted to torpedo the English flagship, _Eagle_ (64). He
reached his quarry unsuspected, but the difficulties of attaching his
“infernal machine” were such that he had to rise to the surface for air
and abandon the enterprise. His subsequent fate was undramatic--he
and his boat were captured at sea on board a merchant ship, which was
carrying him elsewhere for further operations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account