The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The possibilities of the dirigible, on the other hand, no man can
foresee. The gasbag that can be brought to the ground by a single
bullet hole in it, is a very different thing from the possibility of
airships of the future, which may be a mile or two long, divided into
innumerable compartments, filled with non-explosive gas such as is sure
to be discovered sooner or later. Two miles seems an extraordinary
length to-day, but a ship ten miles long would only be something like
the ratio of the early dirigible to the future ones compared to the
ratio Dreadnoughts bear to the first ships built by men.
On the water, bulk is limited by the depth and size of harbours, but
in the vast regions of the air there are practically no limitations
whatever, and there is virtually nothing to limit size, save the
building of land docks on open plains into which airships could descend
for purposes of repair and so forth. Consequently those who hastily
assume from a few accidents that the “lighter than air” craft has no
future are probably making a mistake; at any rate, so far as naval work
is concerned. Certain definite uses are apparent even now to those who
think and ignore commercial rivalries.
It has been wisely laid down that aeroplanes for naval purposes must
be capable of rising from and descending on the water. The Curtiss
was the first successful hydro-aeroplane, but since then floats have
been fitted to various other types with equal success. It is doubtful
whether naval aeroplanes will ever be carried on shipboard like boats,
although this is by no means impossible. It will, however, be more
convenient for a variety of reasons to use them like submarines with
their own special depot ships.
The main naval use of aeroplanes at the outbreak of war was for
scouting purposes. How near they would be able to approach a hostile
fleet was a question not likely to be solved until the day of battle.
The question of their being hit is secondary to the question of their
being upset, owing to tremendous concussions of heavy gun fire. The
idea of aeroplanes dropping bombs down the funnels of warships can be
dismissed as the entirely fanciful dreams of people who know nothing
whatever about aeroplanes or the mathematical problems involved.
Judging by recent events, dropping bombs anywhere upon a moving ship is
nearly or entirely impossible, except at ranges where the aviator would
at once be brought down by rifle fire.
A far more likely and useful service would be the destruction of enemy
aeroplanes. For this purpose a special gun, firing a species of chain
shot, has already been suggested, and the naval aeroplane of the future
was always certain to carry a gun of some kind. The off-chance of doing
a certain amount of damage to a hostile ship by dropping a bomb upon
it, is nothing compared to the importance of destroying the enemy’s
aeroplanes. This last seems likely to be all-important as time goes on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account