The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The duties of naval airships will be of a different nature. Already a
point kept in view in their design is ability to “keep the air” for a
considerable period, and with what are in these days “large airships”
of the Zeppelin type (to which the ill-fated Naval Airship No. 1
_Mayfly_ belonged) there seems no reason why an airship should not be
kept in the air for three or four days already.
The fuel problem is not very difficult, because a great deal can
already be done without the use of the engines, or with only partial
use of them. It is also more than probable that with a view to
further economy some kind of sails, combined with sea-anchors, will
be evolved, whereby the ship might become able to sail in the air
nearly as well as the old three-deckers, or, at any rate, as well as
the masted ironclads, sailed in the water. The difficulty of “keeping
the air” is the inevitable leakage of gas, but as leakage nowadays is
infinitesimally less than it once was, the assumption is that as the
years go on it will eventually be reduced to almost a minus quantity.
Gales will be met by “bulk” and efficient anchors, on the principle
that the gale which swamps a fishing-boat or blows over a haystack has
no effect on a Dreadnought or a cathedral.
Ability to keep the air will enable all Fleets to be accompanied by
airships, which would detect mines and perhaps submarines, and with
their ability to adapt their speeds at will, the presumption is that
they would be able to destroy submarines by bombs.
A further and very important duty would be the detection of torpedo
attacks at night. Experiments carried out in Austria some few years
ago with a captive balloon proved conclusively that except in cases
of thick fog any vessels in motion are easily detected at a distance
of ten or twelve miles. It is not merely the tell-tale flames in the
funnels which betray attacking vessels; their wakes are always clearly
visible, and as a general rule the vessels themselves, no matter how
dark the night.
Bomb-dropping from an airship must be a more serious matter than from
aeroplanes, as so much more in the way of explosives could be carried.
The chance of being hit, however, would probably be so much greater
that it was (when war broke out) unlikely that any airships would be
risked for such purposes. Nor is it very probable that naval airships
will for some time to come attack each other, if they can possibly
avoid it, the reason being that for a good many years they will be
comparatively few in number, and the attack would have, in most cases,
to be delivered in the presence of a fleet, which would make the
attack, to say the least of it, very hazardous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account