The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
In essence, modern uniform is simple enough: that the various ranks
should be noted by special insignia is obviously desirable. For
combatant officers, the distinguishing sleeve-marks are:--
[Illustration: Admiral Vice-Admiral Rear-Admiral Commodore Captain
Commander Lieutenant-Commander Lieutenant Sub-Lieutenant]
Engineer officers wear the same insignia with purple between the
stripes. Non-combatant officers are without the curl to the stripes,
and wear colours to distinguish them as follows:--Doctors, red;
Paymasters, white; Naval Instructors, blue.
The system for the supply of the _personnel_ is to-day altogether
different from what it was a hundred years ago. Till comparatively
recently future deck officers were taken very young, passed into the
Service as Naval Cadets, and thence promoted up to Midshipmen, etc.,
while Engineers and officers of the other civilian branches joined
later in life.
More or less contemporaneously with the Dreadnought era this was
altered by the “New Scheme of Entry,” also known as the “Selbourne
Scheme,” after the then first Lord of the Admiralty, but really the
creation of Admiral Fisher, the Sea Lord who was the moving spirit at
the Admiralty at that time.
Few schemes have been more virulently criticised--few, in some cases,
more unfairly. Like nearly all Admiral Fisher’s innovations, the scheme
was better on paper than in fact. Like all his other schemes it was
carried through at far too great a pace for the ultra-conservative
moods of the British Navy, which has ever resented anything but the
most gradual of changes. On the other hand, it is too often forgotten
by critics that a great agitation on the part of naval engineer
officers, backed by very considerable shore-influences, was then in
existence. Something had to be done, and done quickly. Of Admiral
Fisher it may ever be said that he acted where others merely argued.
Under the New Scheme, the deck-officer, the engineer, and the
marine-officer were all to enter as cadets at a very tender age,
undergo a common training, and be specialised for any Branch at option
or at Admiralty discretion later on.
Whatever may be said against the New Scheme, it was magnificent on
paper. Engineer officers had first come into the Navy as mechanics to
work an auxiliary motive-power in which no “seamen” had much faith.
From that humble beginning the status of their Branch grew and grew,
till both motive-power and the existence of nearly everything on
ship-board depended on the engineers. At the same time the official
status of the Branch remained practically in the same stage as it
did when the first few “greasers” were entered. The deck-officer was
(nominally, at any rate) drawn from the aristocracy; the engineer
officer from the democracy in a great measure. In so far as this
obtained, “social war” was added to the real issue. It was obvious that
this state of affairs was detrimental to naval efficiency. Something
had to be done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account