The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day — John Shaqi
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
Sir William White never claimed for himself that he had anticipated the
future in any way in his torpedo armament, even when defending himself
against criticisms, to the effect that he “gave too little for the
displacement.” Yet his torpedo innovations, besides discounting the
future, all helped to swell the total weight; as also did many internal
strengthenings of the kind which do not show on paper. Possibly he
did not realise his own greatness as the designer of a class of ship
which was so much better than any contemporary vessel, that even in
these days of “Super-Dreadnoughts” the _Royal Sovereigns_ are still
looked back upon with respect, and invariably regarded as marking the
beginning of an entirely new phase in ship construction.
In April, 1889, their designer read a paper about them at the
Institution of Naval Architects, in which the principal points which
he claimed were that much superior command of guns was given, and that
the auxiliary armament was nearly three times the weight of that of the
_Trafalgars_. The following points were also mentioned by him:--
“(_a_) ‘That (it was officially decided that) it was preferable to
have two separate strongly protected stations for the four heavy
guns, rather than to have a single citadel.’
“(_b_) ‘That on the whole the 4-inch armour amidships, from the
belt deck to the main deck, associated as it would be with the
internal coal bunkers, sub-divided into numerous compartments,
might be considered satisfactory; but that if armour weight became
available, it could be profitably utilised in thickening the 4-inch
steel above the middle portion of the belt.’
“I would draw particular attention to the first of these
conclusions, since it expresses a most important distinction
between the two systems of protection.
“With separate redoubts, placed far apart, the two stations
are isolated, and there is practically no risk of simultaneous
disablement by the explosion of shells, or perforation of
projectiles from the heaviest guns. Each redoubt offers a small
target to the fire of an enemy, and its weakest part--the thick
steel protective plating on the top--is of so small extent that the
chance of its being struck is extremely remote. Serious damage to
the unarmoured turret bases therefore involves the perforation of
the thick vertical armour on the redoubts.
“With a single citadel, extending the full breadth of a ship, the
case is widely different.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account