The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The 9.2 were placed in double turrets fore and aft. For those of the
_Minotaur_ electric manœuvring was substituted for the usual hydraulic.
The 7.5’s are disposed in ten single gun houses on the upper deck,
_Warrior_ fashion. The armour belt is of the same maximum thickness,
but only 3in. for 50ft. from the bow. Thereafter it thickens gradually
for the next 75ft. then reaches its maximum. Vertical armour above
the main deck was given up in order to allow for the increased weight
of armament and its protection--a total of 2,073 tons. The _Minotaur_
has Babcock, the other two Yarrow large-tube boilers. No cylindricals
were fitted; the opponents of the water-tube system having lost their
influence by 1905, when the ships were laid down.
None of these ships came up to expectations on trial, though they
developed considerably more than the contract horse-power. The
_Minotaur_ just made her speed, the _Defence_ just failed to reach it,
the _Shannon_ failed by half-a-knot. This last ship had been varied
from the others with an idea that a new form of hull, would produce
better speed--an unfortunate surmise. Shortly after completion all had
15ft. added to their funnels. The increased draught added to their
power somewhat, but did not materially better their speeds.
Further details of these three ships are:--
============+============+===========+==================
Name. | Laid down. | Built at. | Engined by.
------------+------------+-----------+------------------
_Minotaur_ | Jan. ’05 | Devonport | Harland & Wolff
_Defence_ | Feb. ’05 | Pembroke | Scott S. & E. Co.
_Shannon_ | Jan. ’05 | Chatham | Humphrys
============+============+===========+==================
All were completed in 1908. Average cost, £1,400,000 per ship. In them
solid bulkheads first appear, their engine-rooms having no water-tight
doors.
The battleships of the same programme (1904–05) were the _Lord Nelson_
and _Agamemnon_.
Details are:--
Displacement--16,500 tons.
Length (between perpendiculars)--410 ft., (over all) 445ft.
Beam--79½ft.
Draught--(mean) 27ft.
Armament--Four 12-inch, 45 cal., ten 9.2, 50 cal. fifteen
12-pounders, sixteen 3-pounders, five submerged tubes (18in.).
Horse-power--16,750 = 18.5 knots.
Coal--(normal) 900 tons; (maximum) 2,000 tons; also 400 tons oil.
The _Lord Nelson_ was built and engined by Palmer, the _Agamemnon_
by Beardmore and engined by Hawthorn. The former was given Babcock,
the latter Yarrow boilers. Both on trial easily exceeded the contract
speed, and proved abnormally handy ships. They cost £1,500,000 or only
a little more than the _Minotaurs_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account