The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The _Nelsons_ are often counted as “Dreadnoughts”; but their only
claim to the position is they do not happen to carry any 6-inch guns.
Actually they are nothing but improved _King Edwards_, bearing to those
ships very much the same relation as the _Warriors_ to the _Black
Princes_. Their comparatively slow speeds and their mixed armaments
entirely differentiate them from the swifter “all-big-gun” ship which
followed, and, for that matter, caught them up.[23]
The _Nelsons_ were never really successful ships outside the points
alluded to above. Eight of their ten 9.2’s were placed in twin
turrets, and in many circumstances two 9.2 so mounted proved very
little superior in efficiency to a similar single gun in an isolated
gun-house.[24]
In the matter of protection the _Nelsons_ far exceeded the _King
Edwards_. In place of a 9in. belt amidships they were given a 12in.
one, while the 8in. and 6in. strakes above of the earlier ships
became a uniform 8in. The bow belt forward was also augmented to 6in.
on the water-line, surmounted by 4in., instead of a belt uniformly
increasing from 2in. to 6in. further aft. But none of this made them
“Dreadnoughts,” and the absence of “Dreadnought” features relegated
them to the second line very soon after they were completed.
In these ships the tripod mast, the idea of which dates back to the
_Captain_ era, re-appeared. The _Nelsons_ were given as mainmasts the
first of those modern tripods which have characterised nearly every
British capital ship since built till the _Lion_ was altered.
The idea of the tripod mast is to avoid the many shrouds of an ordinary
mast; and so give greater training to the guns. Whether the idea be
of use is another matter. Generally speaking ideas abandoned by our
forefathers have failed to live long if resuscitated.
In the 1902–03 and 1903–04 Estimates provision was made for four
vessels each year of a new type, known as “Scouts.” These were the
_Adventure_ and _Attentive_ (Elswick), _Forward_ and _Foresight_
(Fairfield), _Pathfinder_ and _Patrol_ (Laird), _Sentinel_ and
_Skirmisher_ (Vickers-Maxim). One was awarded each year to each of the
firms mentioned, but all were actually laid down between June, 1903,
and January, 1904. The first four to be given out to contract were
originally named _Eddystone_, _Nore_, _Fastnet_, and _Inchkeith_.
These vessels came to be built owing to an appreciation of the fact
that destroyers had altogether lost their original rôle and had become
torpedo-boats, pure and simple. The “Scouts,” though from three to four
times the size, were the old “catchers” re-introduced.
They compared with these as follows:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account