The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The other two types of the 1909–10 Estimates are the ships generally
known as “super-Dreadnoughts.”
_SUPER-DREADNOUGHTS._
The most obvious feature of the so-called “super-Dreadnoughts” is
the introduction of the 13.5-inch gun, particulars of which will be
found at the end of this chapter. This gun was experimented with
with a certain amount of secrecy, and was for a long time officially
designated as the 12-inch “A,” although practically everybody knew
that it was really a 13.5. It was only rendered possible by recent
improvements in gun-mountings and gun-construction. It is not very
appreciably heavier than the latest type of 12-inch, as mounted in the
_Colossus_, and its adoption was not so much a matter of obtaining
an increased range and penetration, as of securing the tremendously
increased smashing power of the heavier projectile.
Somewhat less obvious to the general public, but really of a great deal
more far-reaching importance, is the “Americanising” of British naval
design exhibited in all the “super-Dreadnoughts.” Though differing in
detail, the arrangement of the armament in all the “super-Dreadnoughts”
followed the American centre-line system, an interesting indication
of the progress of the United States Navy from the days, not so very
long ago, when American warship design was more or less a _pour faire
rire_! It is none the less interesting from the fact that in the
earliest designs, in all ships carrying more than two turrets, the
centre line was the only arrangement ever built or even considered.
Yet when an increased number of turrets came into being, the American
Navy was the only one which followed the original practice. In all
other Navies ideas of the period 1870–1880, when strong end-on fire was
considered an all-important essential, influenced design. America alone
appreciated the prophecy long ago made by Admiral Colomb to the effect
that whatever else might temporarily obtain, broadside to broadside
would always be reverted to for battle, on the grounds that thus, and
thus only, could the maximum number of guns be utilised.
It is proper here to remark that though the Americans adopted the
centre line from the outset for practical reasons, this disposition
became more or less a necessity when 13.5’s came in, owing to the
infinitely greater strain on the structure. This has been occasionally
used as an argument against American influence having made itself felt,
but the balance of evidence shows that even had the 13.5-inch not
appeared, the centre line system would have figured in the Navy. The
original centre-line idea disappeared because the échelon system looked
so superior. The échelon system of the 1875–85 era, however, died
out in its turn on account of certain practical disadvantages. It was
resurrected when these had been forgotten in the lapse of years; but
the disadvantages entailed in firing across a deck soon made themselves
felt again once the system was reverted to.
[Illustration:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account