The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
With the centre line system, the imposition of fighting one side
rather than the other is not imposed, and overhauling or being
overhauled causes no disadvantage. Nothing is lost, save in the almost
hypothetical case of two ships engaging exactly end-on--a condition
which in no case would endure for more than a very short space of time,
to say nothing of the fact that practically all gunnery errors being
of “elevation” and not of “direction,” a ship adopting the end-on
position offers the equivalent of a vertical target of some 60ft. to
70ft. instead of the equivalent of 30ft. or so that she would present
broadside on.
The centre-line system may, therefore, be expected to endure against
all other dispositions pending the appearance of some fresh
condition of affairs which would cause the old end-on idea to be
reverted to.[35]
[Illustration: DIAGRAM TO ILLUSTRATE WEAK POINT OF THE ÉCHELON SYSTEM.]
The _Orion_ was the only one of her class which belonged to the
normal Estimates, 1909–10, the other three--_Conqueror_, _Thunderer_,
_Monarch_--being “contingent ships.” Details of the class are as
follows:--
Displacement--23,500 tons.
Length--(between perpendiculars) 554½ft; (over all) 584ft.
Beam--88½ft.
Draught--(mean) 27¾ft.
Armament--Ten 13.5-inch, forty-five calibre; sixteen 4-inch; three
21-inch torpedo tubes.
Armour Belt--12--4-inch. Turrets, 12-inch.
Machinery--Parsons turbine.
Horse-power--27,000 = 21 knots.
Boilers--Babcock.
Coal--(nominal) 900 tons; (maximum) 2,700 tons; oil, 1,000 tons.
============+=============+=============
Name. | Built at. | Engines by.
------------+-------------+-------------
_Orion_ | Portsmouth | Wallsend Co.
_Conqueror_ | Beardmore | Beardmore
_Thunderer_ | Thames I.W. | Thames I.W.
_Monarch_ | Elswick | Hawthorn
============+=============+=============
The _Orion_ was laid down in November, 1909, the others in April, 1910.
The _Orion_ was the first of these ships to be commissioned, and her
gunnery trials were watched with great interest. Few details of them
transpired, save that part of the secondary battery was injured by
blast. After commissioning, the _Orion_ was sent for a voyage across
the Bay of Biscay, and attracted much attention by rolling very
heavily, this being attributed to the fact that her bilge keels were
not large enough--not to any general structural defect.
An interesting feature of the _Orion_ type is that in it provision
first appears for the protection of boats in action.
Belonging to the same programme (1909–10), the first belonging to the
normal Estimates and the second to the “contingent,” are the battle
cruisers _Lion_ and _Princess Royal_. A great deal of secrecy was
observed about these ships, but their main details are approximately as
follows:--
Displacement--25,000 tons. Full load, 26,350 tons.
Length--(water-line), 675ft.; (over all) 690ft.
Beam--86½ft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account