The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
Draught--(maximum) 30ft.
Armament--Eight 13.5 inch 45 calibre, twenty 4-inch, three 21-inch
torpedo tubes.
Armour--Belt, 9--4-inch.
Machinery--Parsons Turbine.
Horse-power--(as designed) = 28 knots.
Boilers--Yarrow.
Coal--(normal) 1,000 tons; (maximum) 3,500 tons; oil also.
_Lion_--Built at Devonport; engined by Vickers.
_Princess Royal_--Built at Vickers; engined by Vickers.
The _Lion_ was laid down in November, 1909, and launched in the
following year. The _Princess Royal_ was laid down in April, 1910, and
launched a year later. Both were arranged to be completed during 1912.
The _Lion_ was somewhat delayed owing to slight repairs being required
to her turbines. In addition, the authorities very wisely did not
“hurry” her--hurrying ships to fit an exact official date having done
more mischief than anything else in the past.
The _Lion_ did her trials early in 1912, and reached a maximum of
31.7 knots by patent log, with a mean of 29 knots at full power and
24.5 or so at three-quarter power. For her trials the _Lion_ burned
coal only, and this at the seemingly enormous rate of 950 tons a day,
which worked out at approximately about a ton and a quarter per mile.
This consumption, heavy though it seems, really pans out at about the
usual “ton a mile,” as the ship developed horse-power far in excess
of the contract. At the same time it necessarily draws attention to
the enormous increase in coal stores required for supplying modern
warships. It is unfortunately by no means clear that the question of
the very great increase in coal required for modern warships has been
thoroughly realised by the authorities. The amount provided may be said
to be what ships needed in the pre-Dreadnought era. It is now an open
secret that at the time of the “war scare” with Germany in 1911, the
British Home Fleet was unable to proceed to sea owing to a shortage
of coal supply, many ships being a thousand tons short and no proper
arrangements for rapid remedy existing. This state of affairs, at
one time alleged to be merely a newspaper _canard_, is not likely to
occur again; but it is an indication of how difficult it is adequately
to realise the problem of coal supply to ships of ever-increasing
horse-power.
During the _Lion’s_ trials it was found that the heat from the fore
funnel was so great that the fire-control station (then carried on
a tripod mast placed immediately over the forward funnel) was so
intense as to render that position practically impossible. On the
navigating bridge also, instruments were badly affected by the heat.
The ship was consequently further delayed in order to effect essential
modifications. These included the abolition of the tripod mast,
shifting the fore funnel back a long way, and enormously increasing the
height of all funnels.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account