The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
====================+========================+======================
| _Arethusa._ | _Bristol._
--------------------+------------------------+----------------------
Displacement (tons) | 3520 | 4800
Armament | 2--6in. | 2--6in.
| 6--4in. | 10--4in.
| 4 above water t. tubes | 2 submerged t. tubes
Side protection | 2½″ | _nil._
H.P. | 30,000 | 22,000
Speed (est.) kts. | 30 | 25
====================+========================+======================
Fuel supply has never been given out officially, but it may be stated
that, roughly, by making use of oil fuel in the _Arethusa_, a radius
equal to that of the _Bristols_ was secured with a considerable saving
in weight.
Incidentally, this is one of the most interesting examples of how
the progress of invention makes possible to-day the impossibility
of yesterday. When the _Bristols_ were designed they were the “best
possible” of 1908. Four years later oil fuel had opened out an entirely
novel vista.
In the 1913–14 Estimates another eight of similar cruisers were
provided for, with, however, 250 tons odd added to the displacement
and an extra 6-inch gun forward allowed for; though this, however,
was altered afterwards, as this batch of cruisers, the _Calliope_,
_Caroline_, _Carysfort_, _Champion_, _Cleopatra_, _Comus_, _Conquest_,
_Cordelia_, do not carry any 6-inch guns forward like the _Arethusa_,
but mount a couple, one abaft the other aft--a wise arrangement, as a
heavy weight forward does not make for sea-worthiness.
The _Arethusas_ and the “C” class, therefore, compare as follows:--
==============+==========+============+===================
| Forward. | Amidships. | Aft.
--------------+----------+------------+-------------------
_Arethusas_ | One 6in. | Four 4in. | One 6in., two 4in.
“_C_” _class_ | Two 4in. | Six 4in. | Two 6in.
==============+==========+============+===================
which indicates a couple of 4-inch guns gained for the extra 250 tons.
In the 1914–15 Estimates four similar vessels were provided for, but no
details whatever have been published concerning them.
_DESTROYERS IN THE DREADNOUGHT ERA._
The Dreadnought era, while simplifying types of big ships, was the
early institution of two distinct types of destroyers, plus an
experimental vessel which was not duplicated. The original staple
idea of Dreadnought era destroyers was to build very fast ocean-going
destroyers for fleet work, and smaller craft, “coastals,” for
local duties. A considerable flourish of trumpets accompanied the
announcement of this decision, which, however, was in no way really
novel. It merely reproduced in destroyers the long exploded idea of
sea-going and coast-defence ironclads.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account