The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Vol. II. No. 2. Aug., 1888Various
Science
The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Vol. II. No. 2. Aug., 1888
Various
Medicine -- Periodicals
I am well aware that such coercive measures are the only hope of cure in
some cases, but I also know that such patients are not of the better
class, and that, once the drug abandoned, the prospect of continued
recovery is small, because they lack one of the essential requisites for
a permanently good result—that is an earnest desire to be cured.
And the promise of good results from this better way in regarding such
patients is more far reaching than on first thought might appear, for
the ex-opium habitué forced to stem a tide of distrust—special, as to
his cure, and general, as to the permanence of that cure—finds himself
hampered in continued well-doing by the lack of that hopeful trust that
would largely conduce to his good getting on.
In a recent letter from a lady who honored the writer with her care,
nearly three years ago, she referred to the permanence of her recovery,
and added—“but as I found it difficult to make every one believe this,
much less acknowledge it in my favor, I resorted to the best means I
could think of to establish corroborative testimony that _would_ avail,
and during _all_ the time I have been in or near—the past two years, I
have gone regularly every few days to a physician of prominence here, my
old friend and medical adviser of many years’ standing, and had him make
every test he desired, placing on record my exact condition, and showing
the real truth of the matter. I continue to do this, and intend to do
so, and have let people generally know that such a record is being made.
I need not tell you that I am proud of my victory. The struggle against
ungentle and unfair judgment of those around you make a combination of
overwhelming power against the reformed opium taker. It is there that
the _real_ conflict begins.”
The writer’s professional work among this class has long been along the
line here noted. He has extended confidence—very rarely has it been
broken; he has asked for confidence, and the general result can be truly
and tersely stated—increasing satisfaction and success.
And now, gentlemen, what are the conclusions of this whole matter?
These.
Reason and right alike demand a more rational and correct idea as to the
origin of the toxic neurosis we have noted.
This demand complied with—regarding such patients, with certain
exceptions, as creatures of conditions beyond control, and so no more
culpable than the subjects of other functional disorder—will be most
helpful against the protective temptation to untruth.
The medico-legal status of such cases will then be more in keeping with
advanced forensic medicine.
The medical care of these cases will tend to a more humane method, with
a larger promise of good results, both near and remote.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account