The Brooklyn murdersCole, G. D. H. (George Douglas Howard)
General
The Brooklyn murders
Cole, G. D. H. (George Douglas Howard)
Detective and mystery stories; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction; Police -- Great Britain -- Fiction
To begin with, he said to himself, what had he to go upon? Of direct
evidence, not a shred; but where the direct evidence pointed obviously
in the wrong direction, it was necessary to consider very seriously
the question of motive. Walter Brooklyn, he reflected, would not stand
to inherit Sir Vernon’s money unless both nephews were cleared out of
the way. He had, therefore, a motive for both murders together, but
not for either of them except in conjunction with the other. This
seemed to point to the conclusion that, if Walter Brooklyn had
committed either of the murders he had committed both. On the other
hand, it still remained possible that one of the two men had killed
the other, and that Walter Brooklyn, knowing this and realising his
opportunity, had then disposed of the survivor. Or, after all, the
indications might again be as deceptive as those which followed hard
upon the discovery of the murders.
What Woodman had told the inspector provided, however, at least one
clear line of investigation which could be followed up immediately. If
Woodman and other people had seen Walter Brooklyn approaching Liskeard
House and ringing the front-door bell soon after ten o’clock on the
night of the murders, it ought not to be difficult to get further
information about his movements. Had he been admitted to the house;
and if so, when had he left, and why had no mention of his visit
previously been made to the inspector? The best thing was to call at
Liskeard House at once and make inquiries. Inspector Blaikie set off
immediately.
The bell was answered by a maid-servant, and the inspector asked for a
few words with Mr. Winter. He was shown into a small side-room, and
within a minute Winter joined him. The inspector plunged at once into
business.
“Since I have left you there have been certain developments which make
it desirable that I should ask you one or two questions. I want to
know whether, on Tuesday night, any one called at the house during the
evening?”
“Well, sir, of course, there were the guests at dinner that night. You
have their names.”
“Did any one else call—later in the evening, for example?”
“Yes, there was Mr. George. As I told you, he came at about a quarter
or ten minutes to eleven, and left at about 11.30.”
“Did anybody else visit the house that night?”
“No—there was no one else.”
“Now, I want you to be very careful. Are you positive that no one else
called?”
“Yes—I mean, no. I had quite forgotten. At a few minutes after ten Mr.
Walter Brooklyn—Sir Vernon’s brother—came. He sent up his name to Sir
Vernon, and asked him to see him at once. He said it was about
something important.”
“Did Sir Vernon see him?”
“No. He sent down word by one of the temporary men-servants he
couldn’t see him. He told him to see Mr. Prinsep or to write.”
“Then, did Mr. Walter Brooklyn go up to see Mr. Prinsep?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account