Produced by Jana Srna, Bryan Ness and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive.) THE BROTHERS' WAR THE BROTHERS' WAR BY JOHN C. REED OF GEORGIA AUTHOR OF "AMERICAN LAW STUDIES," "CONDUCT OF LAWSUITS" "THE OLD AND NEW SOUTH" BOSTON LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY 1905 _Copyright, 1905_, BY LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY. _All rights reserved_ Published October, 1905 THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, CAMBRIDGE, U. S. A. PREFACE I would explain the real causes and greater consequences of the bloody brothers' war. I pray that all of us be delivered, as far as may be, from bias and prejudice. The return of old affection between the sections showed gracious beginning in the centennial year. In the war with Spain southerners rallied to the stars and stripes as enthusiastically as northerners. Reconcilement has accelerated its pace every hour since. But it is not yet complete. The south has these things to learn: 1. A providence, protecting the American union, hallucinated Garrison, Wendell Phillips, Mrs. Stowe, Sumner, and other radical abolitionists, as to the negro and the effect of southern slavery upon him, its purpose being to destroy slavery because it was the _sine qua non_ of southern nationalization, the only serious menace ever made to that union. This nationalization was stirring strongly before the federal constitution was adopted. The abolitionists, as is the case with all forerunners of great occurrences, were trained and educated by the powers directing evolution, and they were constrained to do not their own will but that of these mighty powers. 2. The cruel cotton tax; the constitution amended to prevent repentance of uncompensated emancipation, which is the greatest confiscation on record; the resolute effort to put the southern whites under the negroes; and other such measures; were but natural outcome of the frenzied intersectional struggle of twenty-five years and the resulting terrible war. Had there been another event, who can be sure that the south would not have committed misdeeds of vengeance against citizens of the north?