Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; United States -- Race relations
At the outset he severely and sternly rebukes two terms of Calhoun's, one
being the use of _constitutional compact_ for _constitution_, and the
other being _the accession of a State to the constitution_. These terms
are utterly impermissible, and are to be scouted. If we accept them, _we
must acquiesce in the monstrous conclusions which the author of the
resolutions draws from them_. That is really what Webster says. Note the
confident positiveness of his pertinent language, some of which we
subjoin:
"It is easy, quite easy, to see why the honorable gentleman has used
it [constitutional compact] in these resolutions. He cannot open the
book, and look upon our written frame of government, without seeing
that it is called a _constitution_. This may well be appalling to him.
It threatens his whole doctrine of compact, and its darling
derivatives, nullification and secession, with instant confutation.
Because, if he admits our instrument of government to be a
_constitution_, then, for that very reason, it is not a compact
between sovereigns; a constitution of government and a compact between
sovereign powers being things essentially unlike in their very
natures, and incapable of ever being the same.
We know no more of a constitutional compact between sovereign powers
than we know of a _constitutional_ indenture of copartnership, a
_constitutional_ bill of exchange. But we know what the _constitution_
is; we know what the bond of our union and the security of our
liberties is; and we mean to maintain and to defend it, in its plain
sense and unsophisticated meaning."
This is enough of the exorcism of that malignant spirit, constitutional
compact. Now as to the other malignant spirit. Webster says:
"The first resolution declares that the people of the several States
'_acceded_' to the constitution, or to the constitutional compact, as
it is called. This word 'accede,' not found either in the constitution
itself, or in the ratification of it by any one of the States, has
been chosen for use here, doubtless, not without a well-considered
purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account