232. Q. _If the idea of a separate human "soul" is to be rejected,
what is it in man which gives him the impression of having a permanent
personality?_
A. _Tanhā_, or the unsatisfied desire for existence. The being
having done that for which he must be rewarded or punished in future,
and having _Tanhā_, will have a rebirth through the influence of
Karma.
233. Q. _What is it that is born?_
A. A new aggregation of Skandhas, or personality[11] caused by the last
generative thought of the dying person.
234. Q. _How many Skandhas are there?_
A. Five.
235. Q. _Name the five Skandhas?_
A. Rūpa, Vedanā, Saññā, Samkhārā,_ and _Viññāna_.
236. Q. _Briefly explain what they are?_
A. __Rūpa_, material qualities; _Vedanā_, sensation; _Saññā_,
abstract ideas; _Samkhārā_, tendencies of mind; _Viññāna_,
mental powers, or consciousness. Of these we are formed; by them we
are conscious of existence; and through them communicate with the world
about us.
237. Q. _To what cause must we attribute the differences in the
combination of the five Skandhas which make every individual differ
from every other individual?_
A. To the ripened Karma of the individual in his preceding births.
238. Q. _What is the force of energy that is at work, under the
guidance of Karma, to produce the new being?_
A. Tanhā--the will to _live_.[12]
239. Q. _Upon what is the doctrine of rebirths founded?_
A. Upon the perception that perfect justice, equilibrium and
adjustment are inherent in the universal system of Nature. Buddhists
do not believe that one life--even though it were extended to one
hundred or five hundred years--is long enough for the reward or
punishment of a man's deeds. The great circle of rebirths will be more
or less quickly run through according to the preponderating purity or
impurity of the several lives of the individual.
240. Q. _Is this new aggregation of Skandhas--this new
personality--the same being as that in the previous birth, whose
Tanhā has brought it into existence?_
A. In one sense it is a new being; in another it is not. In
Pālī it is--"_nacha so nacha añño_" which means not the same nor
yet another. During this life the _Skandhas_ are constantly
changing;[13] and while the man A. B., of forty, is identical, as
regards personality, with the youth A. B., of eighteen, yet, by the
continual waste and reparation of his body, and change of mind and
character, he is a different being. Nevertheless, the man in his old
age justly reaps the reward of suffering consequent upon his thoughts
and actions at every previous stage of his life. So the new being of a
rebirth, being the same individuality as before, but with a changed
form, or new aggregation of _Skandhas_, justly reaps the consequences
of his actions and thoughts in the previous existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account