Byzantine Empire -- History -- Juvenile literature
But even at that, the corporations did not have absolute control of
everything, for over them was the _eparch_, or lord mayor, and over
the _eparch_ was the emperor.
The emperor was supposed to be for all of the people and not for any
group of them, and the emperor had the last word.
In spite of all they accomplished and their charitable principles and
humane ideas, the Byzantines also had faults, however. There was a
black side to their civilization just as there was a bright side, and
some of it was very black indeed.
The Byzantines were very cruel. They were Greek, but they were also
Oriental, and had in them a ferocious streak that not only was
indifferent to suffering but seemed to take a fiendish pleasure in
it. Most mobs are savage, but the Byzantine mob was even more savage
than usual. Only the mobs of the French Revolution can compare with
it.
For instance, when the Byzantines overthrew the emperor Andronicus,
they were not satisfied with just tossing him from his throne. A
howling crowd of men and women tore out his beard, broke his teeth,
beat him, and dragged him through the streets at the tail of a mangy
camel while shouting fearful curses at him. He was seventy years old,
but although he begged to be put out of his misery, it was many hours
before a soldier who was not one of the crowd took pity on him and
killed him.
He was by no means the only emperor who died cruelly. As a matter of
fact, it was a very rare thing for an emperor to die peacefully in
his bed. Usurpers and would-be emperors were often treated just as
savagely as Andronicus had been.
Byzantine laws could be cruel, too, although their cruelty was in
the name of Christianity and mercy. The Byzantines thought it was
against the teachings of Christ to condemn a man to death, and so the
death penalty was rare. Instead, a criminal was mutilated; they tore
out his tongue or cut off his nose or a hand. Blinding was a common
punishment. The Byzantines actually thought it was merciful to blind
a man instead of executing him.
The Byzantines were treacherous, and, in fact, “Byzantine treachery”
became a well-known saying. Probably they were not as treacherous
as their enemies said they were, and their enemies, including the
crusaders, were also treacherous. But in everyday life just as when
they went to war, the Byzantines were always ready to plot, trick,
deceive, and lie. When they did tell the truth, it was usually
because honesty happened to be the best policy, and not because they
thought that honesty was the only right thing.
The emperors often gained the throne by trickery. Michael the
Drunkard made Basil I his co-emperor in the kingdom because Basil had
deceived him into thinking that Michael’s uncle, the _Caesar_ Bardas,
was a traitor. _Caesar_ Bardas was executed. Then Basil waited until
Michael was asleep, and had him murdered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account