The caliph's design : $b Architects! Where is your vortex?Lewis, Wyndham
History
The caliph's design : $b Architects! Where is your vortex?
Lewis, Wyndham
Avant-garde (Aesthetics) -- History -- 19th century; Avant-garde (Aesthetics) -- History -- 20th century
There is no reason at all why there should not be a certain number of
interesting architects. I can also see no reason why this pamphlet
should not bring them forth. I should be very proud of that, and
watch their labours with great interest. This, I think, is such a
modest optimism that I am sure you will allow it. I should like to
see the entire city rebuilt on a more conscious pattern. But this
would automatically happen should an architect of genius turn up who
would invent an architecture for our time and climate that was also a
creative and fertilising art-form. The first great modern building that
arose in this city would soon carry everything before it; and hand in
hand with the engineer, and his new problems, by force of circumstances
so exactly modern ones, would make a new form-content for our everyday
vision. So all we want is one single architect with brains, and we will
regard him with optimism.
Now the question of form-content is obviously one of importance to
every painter. Almost any painter, sculptor, or designer of an actual
type to-day will agree with you that Cheapside, Piccadilly, Russell
Square, Marylebone Road, are thoroughly dull and insignificant masses
of brickwork, laid out according to no coherent plan, bestially
vulgar in their details of ornament, and in every way fit for instant
demolishment. Similarly, he will agree that any large and expensive
West-End restaurant is an eyesore, and a meaningless sham.
Similarly, when you say to him that it is about time something were
done to get rid of this graceless and stupid spectacle, he will
agree, but will quickly change the subject. Every law of common-sense
precludes any possibility of an appreciable modification of this
detestable sight. He will either imagine that you are out for some
Utopia, or he will think that your notions hardly agree with the
fashionable fad-idea that all is for the best in the best of all
possible worlds--that whatever reality, accident, or your neighbour,
that is, flings at your head, your head should resound to, if it is
empty, as it ought to be.
Of course there are good arguments against you. I have made use of
those arguments myself. We have just been envisaging them in the
section of this pamphlet headed “The Bull Sounds.” But we will proceed
to sift out more thoroughly the Painter’s argument; this time not only
the painter or the amateur, but any painter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account