The caliph's design : $b Architects! Where is your vortex? — John Shaqi
The caliph's design : $b Architects! Where is your vortex?Lewis, Wyndham
History
The caliph's design : $b Architects! Where is your vortex?
Lewis, Wyndham
Avant-garde (Aesthetics) -- History -- 19th century; Avant-garde (Aesthetics) -- History -- 20th century
Now all the colour-matching, match-box-making, dressmaking,
chair-painting game, carried on in a spirit of distinguished amateurish
gallantry and refinement at the Omega workshops, before that
institution became extinct, was really _precisely the same thing_, only
conducted with less vigour and intelligence, as the burst of abstract
nature-mortism which has marked the last phase of the Cubist, or
Braquish, movement in Paris. These assemblings of bits of newspaper,
cloth, paint, buttons, tin, and other débris, stuck on to a plank, are
more “amusing” than were the rather jaded and amateur tastefulness of
the Omega workshops. But as regards the Nature-mortists and Fitzroy
tinkerers and tasters, one or other have recognised the affinity. Both
equally are the opposite pole to the credence or intensity of creative
art.
_The Bawdy Critic_
Under a series of promptings from Picasso, then, painting in Paris has
been engineered into a certain position, that appears to me to bear
far too striking a family likeness, in its spirit, to the sensibility
of the English amateur to give one much hope for it. In the analysis
of what I see as a deep weakness, and a scholarly, receptive and
tasteful trend, rather than a creative one, I must put forward a little
testimony, and devote a little space to what are otherwise thoroughly
unimportant people. The important thing is obviously the painting in
Paris, and not the type of English dilettante mind to which I compare
it. But if I can make you see this real and striking community of
temperament and intention, you will know better where you are when
you find yourself in front of an arrangement of bits of newspaper,
cloth, cheese parings, bird’s feathers and tin. You might not otherwise
come to the truth of this mystery at once. For the law that assembled
these objects together will appear, and indeed is, more daring and
abstruse than the more nerveless and more slovenly colour-matching and
cushion-making to which I relate it. Again, it is really only what
happens in a picture that is not organised to attract the objects
that it depicts. Whether you stick a bit of wallpaper and a patch of
trouser-leg side by side on a piece of wood, or use these objects in
a picture painted on a piece of canvas, it is much the same. The only
thing that can be said of these particular experiments is that they
demonstrate an exasperated interest in media and the shop side of
painting, and a certain mental liveliness. But as regards them, there
the life stops.
A desire to accept and enjoy: to accept what is already in the world,
rather than to put something new there: to be in a state of permanent
pâmoison and rant about everything; the odder the thing, the _queerer_
that you should find yourself fainting and ecstatic about it, the
better--the _funnier_, you see? It is in the possession of this spirit,
at bottom, that I am associating these two sets of people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account