The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10) — John Shaqi
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10)Hickson, Sydney J. (Sydney John)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 01 (of 10)
Hickson, Sydney J. (Sydney John)
Animals
CLASSIFICATION.—The classification of the Protozoa is no easy task. We omit
here, for obvious reasons, the unmistakable Plant Protists that have a
holophytic or saprophytic nutrition; that are, with the exception of a
short period of locomotion in the young reproductive cells, permanently
surrounded with a wall of cellulose or fungus-cellulose, and that multiply
and grow freely in this encysted state: to these consequently we relegate
the CHYTRIDIEAE, which so closely allied to the Proteomyxa and the
Phycomycetous Fungi; and the Confervaceae, which in the resting state form
tubular or flattened aggregates and are allied to the green Flagellates;
besides the Schizophyta. At the opposite pole stand the INFUSORIA in the
strict sense, with the most highly differentiated organisation found in our
group, culminating in the possession of a nuclear apparatus with nuclei of
two kinds, and exhibiting a peculiar form of conjugation, in which the
nuclear apparatus is reorganised. The SPOROZOA are clearly marked off as
parasites in living animals, which mostly begin life as sickle-shaped cells
and have always at least two alternating modes of brood-formation, the
first giving rise to aplanospores, wherein is formed the second brood of
sickle-shaped, wriggling zoospores. The remainder, comprising the
SARCODINA, or RHIZOPODA in the old wide sense (including all {49}that move
by pseudopodia during the great part of their active life), and the
FLAGELLATA in the widest sense, are not easy to split up; for many of the
former have flagellate reproductive cells, and many of the latter can emit
pseudopodia with or without the simultaneous retraction of their flagella.
The RADIOLARIA are well defined by the presence in the body plasm of a
central capsule marking it off into a central and a peripheral portion, the
former containing the nucleus, the latter emitting the pseudopodia. Again,
on the other hand, we find that we can separate as FLAGELLATA in the strict
sense the not very natural assemblage of those Protista that have flagella
as their principle organs of movement or nutrition during the greater part
of their active life. The remaining groups (which with the Radiolaria
compose the Sarcodina of Bütschli), are the most difficult to treat. The
RHIZOPODA, as we shall limit them, are naked or possess a simple shell,
never of calcium carbonate, have pseudopodia that never radiate abundantly
nor branch freely, nor coalesce to form plasmatic networks, nor possess an
axial rod of firmer substance. The FORAMINIFERA have a shell, usually of
calcium carbonate, their pseudopodia are freely reticulated, at least
towards the base; and (with the exception of a few simple forms) all are
marine. The MYCETOZOA are clearly united by their tendency to aggregate
more or less completely into complex resting-groups (fructifications), and
by reproducing by unicellular zoospores, flagellate or amoeboid, which are
not known to pair. The HELIOZOA resemble the Radiolaria in their fine
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account