The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)
Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Animals
The teeth on the front part of the radula are often much worn (Fig.
112), and probably fall away by degrees, their place being taken by
others successively pushed up from behind. At the extreme hinder end of
the radula the teeth are in a nascent condition, and there are often
as many as a dozen or more scarcely developed rows. Here, too, lie the
cells from which the teeth are originally formed.
The length and breadth of the radula vary greatly in different genera.
In _Littorina_ it is very narrow, and several times the length of the
whole animal. It is kept coiled away like a watch-spring at the back
of the throat, only a small proportion of the whole being in use. I
have counted as many as 480 rows in the common _Littorina littorea_.
In _Patella_ it is often longer than the shell itself, and if the
radula of a large specimen be freshly extracted and drawn across the
hand, the action of the hooks can be plainly felt. In _Aerope_, the
Turbinidae generally, and _Haliotis_ it is very large. In _Turritella_,
_Aporrhais_, _Cylichna_, _Struthiolaria_, and the Cephalopoda it
is small in proportion to the size of the animal. In the Pulmonata
generally it is very broad, the length not exceeding, as a rule, thrice
the breadth; in most other groups the breadth is inconsiderable, as
compared to the length.
The Radula is wanting in two families of Prosobranchiata, the Eulimidae
and Pyramidellidae, which are consequently grouped together as the
section Gymnoglossa. It is probable that in these cases the radula
has aborted through disuse, the animals having taken to a food
which does not require trituration. Thus several genera contained
in both these families are known to live parasitically upon various
animals--Holothurians, Echinoderms, etc.--nourishing themselves on
the juices of their host. In some cases, the development of a special
suctorial proboscis compensates for the loss of radula (see pp. 76–77).
In _Harpa_ there is no radula in the adult, though it is present in the
young form. No explanation of this fact has yet been given. It is also
absent in the Coralliophilidae, a family closely akin to _Purpura_,
but invariably parasitic on corals, and probably nourished by their
exudations. There is no radula in _Entoconcha_, an obscure form
parasitic on the blood-vessels of _Synapta_, or in _Neomenia_, a genus
of very low organisation, or in the Tethyidae, or sea-hares, or in one
or two other genera of Nudibranchiata.
[Illustration: FIG. 112.--Example of a front portion of a radula
(_Cantharus ringens_ Reeve, Panama), much worn by use. × 70.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account