The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)
Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Animals
The number of teeth in the radula varies greatly. When the teeth are
very large, they are usually few in number, when small, they are
very numerous. In the carnivorous forms, as a rule, the teeth are
comparatively few and powerful, while in the phytophagous genera they
are many and small. Large hooked and sickle-shaped teeth, sometimes
furnished with barbs like an arrow-head, and poison-glands, are
characteristic of genera which feed on flesh; vegetable feeders, on
the contrary, have the teeth rounded, and blunter at the apex, or, if
long and narrow, so slender as to be of comparatively little effect.
Genera which are normally vegetarian, but which will, upon occasion,
eat flesh, _e.g._ _Limax_ and _Hyalinia_, exhibit a form of teeth
intermediate between these two extremes (see Fig. 140, A).
In _Chaetoderma_ there is but one tooth. In _Aeolis coronata_ there are
about 17, in _A. papillosa_ and _Elysia viridis_ about 19, in _Glaucus
atlanticus_ about 21, in _Fiona nobilis_ about 28. In the common
whelk (_Buccinum undatum_) there are from 220 to 250, in the common
periwinkle about 3500. As many as 8343 have been counted in _Limnaea
stagnalis_, about 15,000 in _Helix aspersa_ (that is, about 400,000
to the square inch), about 30,000 in _Limax maximus_, and as many as
40,000 in _Helix Ghiesbreghti_, a large species from Mexico; they are
very numerous also in _Nanina_, _Vitrina_, _Gadinia_, and _Actaeon_.
But _Umbrella_ stands far and away the first, as far as number of teeth
is concerned. In both _U. mediterranea_ and _U. indica_ they entirely
baffle calculation, possibly 750,000 may be somewhere near the truth.
The teeth on the radula are almost invariably disposed in a kind of
pattern, exactly like the longitudinal rows of colour in a piece of
ribbon, down the centre of which runs a narrow stripe, and every band
of colour on one side is repeated in the same relative position on
the other side. The middle tooth of each row--the rows being counted
across the radula, not longitudinally--is called the _central_ or
_rachidian_ tooth; the teeth next adjacent on each side are known as
the _laterals_, while the outermost are styled _uncini_ or _marginals_.
As a rule, the distinction between the laterals and marginals is fairly
well indicated, but in the Helicidae and some of the Nudibranchiata it
is not easy to perceive, and in these cases there is a very gradual
passage from one set to the other.
The central tooth is nearly always present. It is wanting in certain
groups of Opisthobranchiata, some of the carnivorous Pulmonata, and
in the Conidae and Terebridae, which have lost the laterals as well.
_Voluta_ has lost both laterals and marginals in most of the species,
and the same is the case with _Harpa_. In _Aeolis_, _Elysia_, and some
other Nudibranchiata the radula consists of a single central row. Other
peculiarities will be described below in their proper order.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account