The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)
Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Animals
Braun took young individuals of _Limnaea auricularia_ on the day they
were hatched out, and placed them singly in separate vessels with
differing amounts of water. This was on 15th June 1887. In August 1888
specimen _A_ had only produced a little spawn, out of which three
young were hatched; specimen _B_ had produced four pieces of spawn
of different sizes, all of which were hatched; specimen _C_, which
happened to be living with three _Planorbis_, produced five pieces
of spawn distinctly Limnaeidan, but nothing is recorded of their
hatching. Self-impregnation, therefore, with a fruitful result, appears
established for this species of _Limnaea_.[97]
=Reproduction of Lost Parts.=--When deprived of their tentacles, eyes,
or portions of the foot, Mollusca do not seem to suffer severely, and
generally reproduce the lost parts in a short time. If, however, one of
the ganglia is injured, they perish. Certain of the Mollusca possess
the curious property of being able to amputate certain parts at will.
When _Prophysaon_, a species of Californian slug, is annoyed by being
handled, an indented line appears at a point about two-thirds of the
length from the head, the line deepens, and eventually the tail is
shaken completely off. Sometimes the _Prophysaon_ only threatens this
spontaneous dismemberment; this line appears (always exactly in the
same place), but it thinks better of it, and the indentation proceeds
no further.[98] According to Gundlach,[99] _Helix imperator_ and _H.
crenilabris_, two large species from Cuba, possess the same property,
which is said to be also characteristic of the sub-genus _Stenopus_
(W. Indies). Amongst marine species, _Harpa ventricosa_ and _Solen
siliqua_ have been observed to act in a similar way, _Harpa_ apparently
cutting off the end of the foot by pressure of the shell. Karl Semper,
in commenting on the same property in species of _Helicarion_ from the
Philippines (which whisk their tail up and down with almost convulsive
rapidity, until it drops off), considers[100] it greatly to the
advantage of the mollusc, since any predacious bird which attempted
to seize it, but only secured a fragment of tail, would probably be
discouraged from a second attack, especially as the _Helicarion_ would
meanwhile have had time to conceal itself among the foliage.
=Strength and Muscular Force.=--The muscular strength of snails is
surprisingly great. Sandford relates[101] an experiment on a _Helix
aspersa_, weighing ¼ oz. He found it could drag vertically a weight of
2¼ oz., or nine times its own weight. Another snail, weighing ⅓ oz.,
was able to drag in a horizontal direction along a smooth table twelve
reels of cotton, a pair of scissors, a screwdriver, a key, and a knife,
weighing in all no less than 17 oz., or more than fifty times its own
weight. This latter experiment was much the same as asking a man of 12
stone to pull a load of over 3¾ tons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account