The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10) — John Shaqi
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 03 (of 10)
Cooke, A. H. (Alfred Hands)
Animals
=Position of Mollusca in the Animal Kingdom.=--Up to very recent times
it was usual to regard the Mollusca as one of the four subdivisions
of a great family known as _Malacozoa_, the subdivisions being (1)
Mollusca, (2) Tunicata, (3) Brachiopoda, (4) Polyzoa or Bryozoa. This
classification is still retained in the leading modern manual on the
subject.[3] The progress, however, of investigation leads to the belief
that the Mollusca are not so closely related to these other groups as
such a classification would seem to imply. The Tunicata, for instance,
appear, from the whole course of their development, to occupy a
position near to the Vertebrata. The relations of the Brachiopoda
and Polyzoa will be more particularly referred to in that part of
this History which deals especially with those groups. The position
of the Mollusca is, in many respects, one of considerable isolation.
Any attempt, therefore, definitely to relate them to one group or
another, is, in all probability, to go further than the present state
of our knowledge warrants. Especially to be deprecated are systems of
classification which confidently _derive_ the Mollusca in general from
this or that group. The first undisputed traces of animal life, which
appear in the Cambrian epoch, exhibit the same phyletic distinctions as
now exist. Sponges, Echinoderms, Mollusca, and Worms, formed already,
in those immeasurably remote ages, groups apparently as generally
distinct from one another as they are at the present time. It would
seem that any theory of development, which confidently teaches the
derivation of any one of these groups from any other, is, in the
present state of the evidence before us, hazardous in the extreme.
Some indications of relationship, which must not be pushed too far, may
be drawn from a consideration of embryonic resemblance. An especial
characteristic of the Mollusca is the possession of a particular form
of larva, which occurs in one of the stages of development, known as
the _trochosphere_ (see p. 130). This form of larva is shared with two
orders of Annelida, the Chaetopoda and the Gephyrea armata, and, in
all probability, with the Polyzoa as well. It may also be significant
that the adult form in Rotifera bears a close resemblance to the
trochosphere larva in those groups.
=Basis of Classification.=--The Mollusca are divided into four
great Orders--=Cephalopoda=, =Gasteropoda=, =Scaphopoda=, and
=Pelecypoda=.[4] Each name, it will be noticed, bears reference to the
‘foot,’ _i.e._ to the organ of motion which corresponds in function to
the foot in the Vertebrata.
In the _Cephalopoda_ the feet, or, as they are more frequently termed,
the ‘arms,’ are arranged symmetrically round the head or mouth. The
common forms of ‘cuttle-fish’ (_Octopus_, _Loligo_) are familiar
examples of Cephalopods.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account