The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
Before the discovery of the ventral surface of Trilobites it was thought
by some zoologists that their =affinities= were with the Xiphosura
rather than with the Crustacea. But the presence of antennae, and of
five pairs of cephalic appendages; the biramous thoracic and pygidial
appendages, the hypostome, and the character of the larval form, as well
as the absence of a genital operculum, separate the Trilobites from the
Xiphosura and connect them with the Crustacea.
The position of the Trilobites in the Crustacea is, however, difficult
to determine. Already in the Cambrian period, at least five main groups
of the Crustacea were clearly differentiated, namely, the Phyllopoda,
Ostracoda, Cirripedia, Trilobita, and Leptostraca (Phyllocarida), and
probably also the Copepoda, but of the last no remains have been
preserved as fossils. Palaeontology, therefore, furnishes no connecting
links between any two of these orders.
The Crustacea to which the Trilobites show some resemblance are the
families Apodidae and Branchipodidae of the Order Phyllopoda (see pp.
19–36). The Trilobita agree with those families in having a large but
variable number of trunk-segments, in the possession of a large labrum
(hypostome), and in the occurrence of gnathobases on the thoracic
appendages; also the foliation of some of the trunk-appendages is
somewhat similar. The points of difference, however, are considerable;
thus the cephalic appendages are much more specialised in the Apodidae
and Branchipodidae than in the Trilobita; in the latter all, with the
exception of the antennae, are distinctly biramous, and whilst the basal
joints were masticatory the distal parts appear to have been locomotor
organs. The appendages of the trunk also differ considerably; in the
Trilobita all are clearly biramous, those of the thorax having a
schizopodal form. In the possession of a single pair of antennae the
Trilobita differ from other Crustacea; but in some forms of _Apus_ the
second pair of antennae may be rudimentary or even absent.
There are still other features which characterise the Trilobita: thus
the eyes are borne on free cheeks, and differ in structure from those of
Phyllopods. The broad pygidium formed of fused segments and without
terminal fulcra is quite unlike the slender-jointed abdomen of _Apus_
and _Branchipus_; and whilst in the Trilobites all the segments bear
appendages, in the Phyllopods some, at any rate, of the posterior
segments are devoid of appendages. The distinct division of the body
into an axial and pleural region is not seen in Phyllopods, and is
probably a character of some importance, since it occurs in the great
majority of Trilobites, including all the early forms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account