The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
With regard to the =affinities= of the group it is now almost
universally accepted that they are Arachnids. The chief features in
which they differ from other Arachnids are the presence of gills and the
absence of Malpighian tubules, both being features associated with
aquatic life. As long ago as 1829 Straus-Dürckheim emphasised the points
of resemblance between the two groups, and although the view was during
the middle of the last century by no means universally accepted, towards
the end of that epoch the painstaking researches of Lankester and his
pupils, who compared the King-crab and the Scorpion, segment with
segment, organ with organ, tissue with tissue, almost cell with cell,
established the connexion beyond doubt. Lankester would put the
Trilobites in the same phylum, but in this we do not follow him. With
regard to the brilliant but, to our mind, unconvincing speculations as
to the connexion of some _Limulus_-like ancestor with the Vertebrates,
we must refer the reader to the ingenious writings of Dr. Gaskell,[222]
recently summarised in his volume on “The Origin of Vertebrates,” and to
those of Dr. Patten in his article “On the Origin of Vertebrates from
Arachnids.”[223]
=Fossil Xiphosura.=[224]
[Illustration:
FIG. 159.—=A.=, _Hemiaspis limuloides_, Woodw., Upper Silurian,
Leintwardine, Shropshire. Natural size. (After Woodward.) =B.=,
_Prestwichia_ (_Euroöps_) _danae_ (Meek), Carboniferous, Illinois, ×
⅔. (After Packard.)
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account