The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
The essential fact that the two types of limb are built on the same plan
may be considered as established; but it may be urged that the biramous
type represents this common plan more nearly than the foliaceous. It is,
at any rate, certain that in the maxillipedes of the Decapoda we witness
the conversion of the biramous type into the foliaceous by the expansion
of the basal joints concomitantly with the assumption by the
maxillipedes of masticatory functions. Thus in the Decapoda the first
maxillipede is decidedly foliaceous owing to the expanded “gnathobases”
(Fig. 1, A, _bp_, _cxp_), and the second maxillipedes are flattened,
with their basal joints somewhat expanded and furnished with biting
hairs; but in the “Schizopoda” (_e.g._ _Mysis_) the first maxillipede is
a typical biramous limb, though the expanded gnathobases in some forms
are beginning to project (Fig. 1, E), while the limb following, which
corresponds to the second maxillipede of Decapods, is simply a biramous
swimming leg. Besides this obvious conversion of a biramous into a
foliaceous limb, further evidence of the fundamental character of the
biramous type is found, first, in its invariable occurrence in the
Nauplius stage, which does not necessarily mean that the ancestors of
the Crustacea possessed this type of limb in the adult, but which does
imply that this type of limb was possessed at some period of life by the
common ancestral Crustacean; and, second, the limbs of the Trilobita, a
group which probably stands near the origin of the Crustacea, have been
shown by Beecher to conform to the biramous type (Fig. 1, H).
Furthermore, the thoracic limbs of Nebalia, an animal which combines
many of the characteristics of Entomostraca and Malacostraca, and is
therefore considered as a primitive type, despite their flattened
character, are really built upon a biramous plan (Fig. 1, G).
In conclusion, we may point out that this view of the Crustacean limb,
as essentially a biramous structure, agrees with the conclusion derived
from our consideration of the segmentation of the body, and points less
to the Branchiopoda as primitive Crustacea and more to some generalised
Malacostracan type.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10) — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account